Eosinophilic Solid and Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Morphologic and Immunohistochemical Study of 18 Cases and Review of the Literature
Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma is now defined in the 5th edition of the 2022 World Health Organization classification of urogenital tumors. To perform morphologic, immunohistochemical, and preliminary genetic studies about this new entity in China for the purpose of understanding...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine (1976) 2024-10, Vol.148 (10), p.1126-1134 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma is now defined in the 5th edition of the 2022 World Health Organization classification of urogenital tumors.
To perform morphologic, immunohistochemical, and preliminary genetic studies about this new entity in China for the purpose of understanding it better.
The study includes 18 patients from a regional tertiary oncology center in northern China (Tianjin, China). We investigated the clinical and immunohistochemical features of these cases.
The mean age of patients was 49.6 years and the male to female ratio was 11:7. Macroscopically, 1 case had the classic cystic and solid appearance whereas the others appeared purely solid. Microscopically, all 18 tumors shared similar solid and focal macrocystic or microcystic growth pattern, and the cells were characterized by voluminous and eosinophilic cytoplasm, along with coarse amphophilic stippling. Immunohistochemically, most of the tumors had a predominant cytokeratin (CK) 20-positive feature, ranging from focal cytoplasmic staining to diffuse membranous accentuation. Initially, we separated these cases into different immunohistochemical phenotypes. Group 1 (7 of 18; 38.5%) was characterized by positive phospho-4EBP1 and phospho-S6, which can imply hyperactive mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling. Group 2 (4 of 18; 23%) was negative for NF2, probably implying a germline mutation of NF2. Group 3 (7 of 18; 38.5%) consisted of the remaining cases. One case had metastatic spread and exhibited an aggressive clinical course, and we detected cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) mutation in this case; other patients were alive and without disease progression.
Our research proposes that eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma exhibits prototypical pathologic features with CK20 positivity and has aggressive potential. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-9985 1543-2165 1543-2165 |
DOI: | 10.5858/arpa.2023-0122-OA |