A comparison of the usage of an open-source automated insulin delivery system and the MiniMed™ 780 G system in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in real-world settings: the AWeSoMe study group

Purpose In recent years there has been a noticeable increase in the use of advanced hybrid closed-loop systems (AHCLs) for managing type 1 diabetes (T1D) among youth. However, there is a lack of comparison between the open-source automated insulin delivery (AID) system and the MiniMed™ 780 G system...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Endocrine 2024-06, Vol.84 (3), p.943-950
Hauptverfasser: Landau, Zohar, Lebenthal, Yael, Mazor-Aronovitch, Kineret, Brener, Avivit, Levek, Noah, Jacobi-Polishook, Talia, Ben Ari, Tal, Abiri, Shirly, Haim, Alon, Nir, Judith, Rachmiel, Marianna, Pinhas-Hamiel, Orit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose In recent years there has been a noticeable increase in the use of advanced hybrid closed-loop systems (AHCLs) for managing type 1 diabetes (T1D) among youth. However, there is a lack of comparison between the open-source automated insulin delivery (AID) system and the MiniMed™ 780 G system (780 G). Methods In this multi-center study, we retrospectively compared selected glycemic ranges of 26 individuals who used open-source AID and 20 individuals who used 780 G (age 11.3 years [IQR 9.3, 12.9] and 13.4 years [IQR 10.9, 16.5], respectively, p  = 0.069) from system initiation to the most recent visit. Results At baseline, the median HbA1c was significantly lower and the time below range (TBR)
ISSN:1559-0100
1355-008X
1559-0100
DOI:10.1007/s12020-024-03683-w