Comparison of Octreotide and Vasopressors as First-Line Treatment for Intraoperative Carcinoid Crisis
Background Intraoperative carcinoid crisis is typically sudden onset of profound hypotension during operations on patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The crisis was thought to be due to massive release of hormones, and perioperative octreotide was recommended as a prophylaxis against the crisis and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of surgical oncology 2024-05, Vol.31 (5), p.2996-3002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Intraoperative carcinoid crisis is typically sudden onset of profound hypotension during operations on patients with neuroendocrine tumors. The crisis was thought to be due to massive release of hormones, and perioperative octreotide was recommended as a prophylaxis against the crisis and as first-line treatment. Recent studies show that octreotide does not prevent the crisis and that no massive release of hormones occurs. Therefore, the authors hypothesized that octreotide is not effective for treating the crisis.
Methods
A prospective carcinoid anesthesia database was analyzed for occurrences of crisis. Outcomes were compared between protocols when first-line therapy was bolus octreotide and when it was vasopressors without octreotide. Significance was determined by Student’s
t
test, the Mann-Whitney
U
test, and Fisher’s exact test.
Results
Among operations performed with octreotide as first-line treatment (
n
= 150), crisis occurred for 45 (30 %) patients, the median crisis duration was 6 min, 12 (27 %) patients had crises longer than 10 min, 42 patients (93 %) required subsequent vasopressor administration to resolve the crisis, and 3 (2 %) operations were aborted. Among operations performed with vasopressors as the first-line treatment (
n
= 195), crisis occurred for 49 (25 %) patients (
p
= 0.31), the median crisis duration was 3 min (
p
< 0.001), and no crisis lasted longer than 10 min (
p
= 0.001). Patients treated with vasopressors were less likely to have multiple crises and had a shorter total time in crisis, a shorter anesthesia time, and no aborted operations (
p
< 0.05 for all).
Conclusions
First-line octreotide was ineffective treatment for carcinoid crisis, with patients requiring vasopressors to resolve the crisis, and many crises lasting longer than 10 min. First-line vasopressor treatment resulted in significantly shorter crisis durations, fewer crises and aborted operations, and shorter anesthesia times. Vasopressors should be used as first-line treatment for intraoperative crisis, and treatment guidelines should be changed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1068-9265 1534-4681 |
DOI: | 10.1245/s10434-023-14876-4 |