Comparison of two techniques for implementing the proper orthogonal decomposition method in damage detection problems

The viability of using the reduced-order proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) (alsocalled principal component analysis) methods to reduce the total computational time to detect damages using eddy current nondestructive evaluation techniques was demonstrated in a previous paper [1]. In this paper, w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mathematical and computer modelling 2004-09, Vol.40 (5), p.553-571
1. Verfasser: Joyner, M.L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The viability of using the reduced-order proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) (alsocalled principal component analysis) methods to reduce the total computational time to detect damages using eddy current nondestructive evaluation techniques was demonstrated in a previous paper [1]. In this paper, we concentrate on various alternatives used to form the reduced-order solution to the forward problem, still in the context of eddy current damage detection. In particular, we focus on two different algorithms, a POD/Galerkin technique and a POD/interpolation technique. The POD/Galerkin method is a popular choice in the implementation of the POD method; however, in this paper, we will point out some of the problems in the traditional implementation of the reduced-order POD/Galerkin method when used in conjunction with eddy current damage detection. We will also compare the POD/Galerkin method to the POD/interpolation method and argue that in certain circumstances, the POD/interpolation method may be a better choice.
ISSN:0895-7177
1872-9479
DOI:10.1016/j.mcm.2003.10.050