Assessing bone formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in a murine model treated with bisphosphonates

Objective To evaluate the osseointegration of implants with hydrophobic (HFB) and hydrophilic (HFL) surfaces in a murine model of high-dose bisphosphonates (BPs). Materials and methods Sixty-four rats were randomly allocated into four groups: control group with HFB implants (CG-HFB), control group w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral investigations 2024-01, Vol.28 (1), p.89-89, Article 89
Hauptverfasser: Sánchez-Puetate, Julio Cesar, Silva, Bruno Luís Graciliano, Pinotti, Felipe Eduardo, Marcantonio, Camila Chierici, de Oliveira, Guilherme José Pimentel Lopes, Junior, Elcio Marcantonio, Marcantonio, Rosemary Adriana Chierici
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To evaluate the osseointegration of implants with hydrophobic (HFB) and hydrophilic (HFL) surfaces in a murine model of high-dose bisphosphonates (BPs). Materials and methods Sixty-four rats were randomly allocated into four groups: control group with HFB implants (CG-HFB), control group with HFL implants (CG-HFL), BP group with HFB implants (BP-HFB), and BP group with HFL implants (BP-HFL). Animals were euthanized after 15 and 45 days ( n =8). The dependent variables assessed were the removal torque (biomechanical analysis), the bone volume around the implants (%BV/TV) (microtomographic analysis), the bone-implant contact (%BIC), the bone between the threads (%BBT) (histomorphometric analysis), and the expression of bone metabolism markers (immunohistochemistry analysis). Results The CG-HFL and BP-HFL groups presented higher removal torque than the CG-HFB and BP-HFB implants. The %BIC of the CG-HFL surfaces was slightly higher than that of the CG-HFB implants. The BP-HFB and BP-HFL groups presented a higher %BIC than that of the CG-HFB and CG-HFL groups ( p
ISSN:1436-3771
1432-6981
1436-3771
DOI:10.1007/s00784-023-05480-7