Four sides to the story: A proteomic comparison of liquid‐phase and matrix‐bound extracellular vesicles in 2D and 3D cell cultures

Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs)‐derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) play important roles in cellular communication and are extensively studied as promising therapeutic agents. While there is a substantial pool of studies on liquid‐phase EVs, data on EVs bound to the extracellular matrix (ECM) is lacking. There is also an emerging trend of accumulating and comparing data on characteristics of EVs obtained in different culturing conditions. Aiming to reveal proteomic signatures of EVs obtained from conditioned media and ECM of MSCs cultured in 2D and 3D conditions, we performed liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Bioinformatic analysis revealed common patterns in proteomic composition of liquid‐phase EVs and matrix‐bound vesicles (MBVs), namely extracellular environment organization, immune, and transport pathways enrichment. However, extracellular environmental organization pathways are more enriched in liquid‐phase EVs than in MBVs, while MBVs proteins noticeably enrich enzymatic pathways. Furthermore, each type of EVs from 2D and 3D cultures has a unique differential abundance profile. We have also performed comparative functional assays, namely scratch assay to assess EVs effect on cell migration and tubulogenesis assay to evaluate EVs angiogenic potential. We found that both liquid‐phase EVs and MBVs enhance cell migration, while angiogenic potential is higher in MBVs. Results of the present study suggest that while both liquid‐phase EVs and MBVs have therapeutic potential, some unique features of each subgroup may determine optimal areas of their application.