Pore size estimation in axon‐mimicking microfibers with diffusion‐relaxation MRI

Purpose This study aims to evaluate two distinct approaches for fiber radius estimation using diffusion‐relaxation MRI data acquired in biomimetic microfiber phantoms that mimic hollow axons. The methods considered are the spherical mean power‐law approach and a T2‐based pore size estimation techniq...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2024-06, Vol.91 (6), p.2579-2596
Hauptverfasser: Canales‐Rodríguez, Erick J., Pizzolato, Marco, Zhou, Feng‐Lei, Barakovic, Muhamed, Thiran, Jean‐Philippe, Jones, Derek K., Parker, Geoffrey J. M., Dyrby, Tim B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study aims to evaluate two distinct approaches for fiber radius estimation using diffusion‐relaxation MRI data acquired in biomimetic microfiber phantoms that mimic hollow axons. The methods considered are the spherical mean power‐law approach and a T2‐based pore size estimation technique. Theory and Methods A general diffusion‐relaxation theoretical model for the spherical mean signal from water molecules within a distribution of cylinders with varying radii was introduced, encompassing the evaluated models as particular cases. Additionally, a new numerical approach was presented for estimating effective radii (i.e., MRI‐visible mean radii) from the ground truth radii distributions, not reliant on previous theoretical approximations and adaptable to various acquisition sequences. The ground truth radii were obtained from scanning electron microscope images. Results Both methods show a linear relationship between effective radii estimated from MRI data and ground‐truth radii distributions, although some discrepancies were observed. The spherical mean power‐law method overestimated fiber radii. Conversely, the T2‐based method exhibited higher sensitivity to smaller fiber radii, but faced limitations in accurately estimating the radius in one particular phantom, possibly because of material‐specific relaxation changes. Conclusion The study demonstrates the feasibility of both techniques to predict pore sizes of hollow microfibers. The T2‐based technique, unlike the spherical mean power‐law method, does not demand ultra‐high diffusion gradients, but requires calibration with known radius distributions. This research contributes to the ongoing development and evaluation of neuroimaging techniques for fiber radius estimation, highlights the advantages and limitations of both methods, and provides datasets for reproducible research.
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.29991