Effects of Creep on Shield Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground

The present work aims to improve the reliability of shield jamming and lining damage risk assessment in squeezing ground by analysing the effects of creep on the evolution of rock pressure over time. The study is based on numerical simulations of typical mechanised tunnelling processes, generally co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rock mechanics and rock engineering 2024, Vol.57 (1), p.351-374
Hauptverfasser: Leone, Thomas, Nordas, Alexandros N., Anagnostou, Georgios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 1
container_start_page 351
container_title Rock mechanics and rock engineering
container_volume 57
creator Leone, Thomas
Nordas, Alexandros N.
Anagnostou, Georgios
description The present work aims to improve the reliability of shield jamming and lining damage risk assessment in squeezing ground by analysing the effects of creep on the evolution of rock pressure over time. The study is based on numerical simulations of typical mechanised tunnelling processes, generally consisting of shield advance phases alternating with shorter or longer standstills for lining installation, maintenance, etc . A linear elastic—viscous plastic constitutive model based upon Perzyna’s overstress theory is employed, which considers the time-dependency of plastic deformations via a single viscosity parameter. The investigations demonstrate the following: (i) shield loading during advance increases with increasing viscosity under certain conditions, which contradicts the common perception in many existing works that creep is thoroughly favourable for shield jamming; (ii) creep is thoroughly unfavourable for shield loading during long standstills and long-term lining loading, due to the additional viscoplastic ground deformations manifested over time; (iii) the commonly adopted simplifying assumption of continuous excavation with the gross advance rate is adequate only where standstills are very short (e.g., for lining erection during the stop-and-go shield tunnelling process), but otherwise underestimates the shield loading, even in cases of regular inspection and maintenance standstills lasting only a few hours. Two application examples, the Fréjus safety gallery and the Gotthard Base tunnel, demonstrate the need to consider creep and the accuracy of modelling tunnel construction by a semi-discrete approach, where only the very short standstills for lining erection are considered via an average advance rate, but longer standstills are explicitly simulated. Highlights Assessment of the effect of creep on TBM shield loading. Assessment of the effect of creep on long-term lining loading. Analysis of a counter-intuitive, adverse effect of advance rate on shield loading. Discussion of alternative methods of considering excavation standstills. Development of a semi-discrete model for estimating shield loading during standstills.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00603-023-03505-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2911842573</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2910040396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-ed4b032b2e6b356d261767407b936150d2bc2c7db10692fa731e18d053c2801d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRbK2-gAsJuHETvfOfbAQptQoFF63gbkgykzYlndSZBmqf3qmpCi5cDAP3fPfcw0HoEsMtBpB3HkAAjYGERznweHuE-phRFjNO345RH2SQiKCkh868XwIEUSanqEcTnCScQR_dj8rSFBsfNWU0dMaso8ZG00Vlah3NWmtNXVd2Hs0Wrmnni2j63hqz20_GYWD1OTops9qbi8M_QK-Po9nwKZ68jJ-HD5O4YDjdxEazHCjJiRE55UITgaWQDGSeUoE5aJIXpJA6xyBSUmaSYoMTDZwWJAGs6QDddL5r14QIfqNWlS9CuMyapvWKpBgnjHBJA3r9B102rbMh3Z4CYEBTESjSUYVrvHemVGtXrTL3oTCofbuqa1eFdtVXu2oblq4O1m2-Mvpn5bvOANAO8EGyc-N-b_9j-wm6b4Lj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2910040396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Creep on Shield Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Leone, Thomas ; Nordas, Alexandros N. ; Anagnostou, Georgios</creator><creatorcontrib>Leone, Thomas ; Nordas, Alexandros N. ; Anagnostou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><description>The present work aims to improve the reliability of shield jamming and lining damage risk assessment in squeezing ground by analysing the effects of creep on the evolution of rock pressure over time. The study is based on numerical simulations of typical mechanised tunnelling processes, generally consisting of shield advance phases alternating with shorter or longer standstills for lining installation, maintenance, etc . A linear elastic—viscous plastic constitutive model based upon Perzyna’s overstress theory is employed, which considers the time-dependency of plastic deformations via a single viscosity parameter. The investigations demonstrate the following: (i) shield loading during advance increases with increasing viscosity under certain conditions, which contradicts the common perception in many existing works that creep is thoroughly favourable for shield jamming; (ii) creep is thoroughly unfavourable for shield loading during long standstills and long-term lining loading, due to the additional viscoplastic ground deformations manifested over time; (iii) the commonly adopted simplifying assumption of continuous excavation with the gross advance rate is adequate only where standstills are very short (e.g., for lining erection during the stop-and-go shield tunnelling process), but otherwise underestimates the shield loading, even in cases of regular inspection and maintenance standstills lasting only a few hours. Two application examples, the Fréjus safety gallery and the Gotthard Base tunnel, demonstrate the need to consider creep and the accuracy of modelling tunnel construction by a semi-discrete approach, where only the very short standstills for lining erection are considered via an average advance rate, but longer standstills are explicitly simulated. Highlights Assessment of the effect of creep on TBM shield loading. Assessment of the effect of creep on long-term lining loading. Analysis of a counter-intuitive, adverse effect of advance rate on shield loading. Discussion of alternative methods of considering excavation standstills. Development of a semi-discrete model for estimating shield loading during standstills.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0723-2632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-453X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00603-023-03505-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38188540</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Boring machines ; Civil Engineering ; Compressing ; Constitutive models ; Damage assessment ; Deformation ; Dredging ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Excavation ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Inspection ; Jamming ; Maintenance ; Mathematical models ; Model accuracy ; Original Paper ; Risk assessment ; Solifluction ; Time dependence ; Tunnel construction ; Tunneling ; Tunneling shields ; Tunnels ; Viscosity</subject><ispartof>Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 2024, Vol.57 (1), p.351-374</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-ed4b032b2e6b356d261767407b936150d2bc2c7db10692fa731e18d053c2801d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-ed4b032b2e6b356d261767407b936150d2bc2c7db10692fa731e18d053c2801d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2863-4892</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00603-023-03505-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00603-023-03505-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38188540$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leone, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordas, Alexandros N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anagnostou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Creep on Shield Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground</title><title>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</title><addtitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</addtitle><addtitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</addtitle><description>The present work aims to improve the reliability of shield jamming and lining damage risk assessment in squeezing ground by analysing the effects of creep on the evolution of rock pressure over time. The study is based on numerical simulations of typical mechanised tunnelling processes, generally consisting of shield advance phases alternating with shorter or longer standstills for lining installation, maintenance, etc . A linear elastic—viscous plastic constitutive model based upon Perzyna’s overstress theory is employed, which considers the time-dependency of plastic deformations via a single viscosity parameter. The investigations demonstrate the following: (i) shield loading during advance increases with increasing viscosity under certain conditions, which contradicts the common perception in many existing works that creep is thoroughly favourable for shield jamming; (ii) creep is thoroughly unfavourable for shield loading during long standstills and long-term lining loading, due to the additional viscoplastic ground deformations manifested over time; (iii) the commonly adopted simplifying assumption of continuous excavation with the gross advance rate is adequate only where standstills are very short (e.g., for lining erection during the stop-and-go shield tunnelling process), but otherwise underestimates the shield loading, even in cases of regular inspection and maintenance standstills lasting only a few hours. Two application examples, the Fréjus safety gallery and the Gotthard Base tunnel, demonstrate the need to consider creep and the accuracy of modelling tunnel construction by a semi-discrete approach, where only the very short standstills for lining erection are considered via an average advance rate, but longer standstills are explicitly simulated. Highlights Assessment of the effect of creep on TBM shield loading. Assessment of the effect of creep on long-term lining loading. Analysis of a counter-intuitive, adverse effect of advance rate on shield loading. Discussion of alternative methods of considering excavation standstills. Development of a semi-discrete model for estimating shield loading during standstills.</description><subject>Boring machines</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Compressing</subject><subject>Constitutive models</subject><subject>Damage assessment</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Dredging</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Excavation</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Jamming</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Solifluction</subject><subject>Time dependence</subject><subject>Tunnel construction</subject><subject>Tunneling</subject><subject>Tunneling shields</subject><subject>Tunnels</subject><subject>Viscosity</subject><issn>0723-2632</issn><issn>1434-453X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1Kw0AUhQdRbK2-gAsJuHETvfOfbAQptQoFF63gbkgykzYlndSZBmqf3qmpCi5cDAP3fPfcw0HoEsMtBpB3HkAAjYGERznweHuE-phRFjNO345RH2SQiKCkh868XwIEUSanqEcTnCScQR_dj8rSFBsfNWU0dMaso8ZG00Vlah3NWmtNXVd2Hs0Wrmnni2j63hqz20_GYWD1OTops9qbi8M_QK-Po9nwKZ68jJ-HD5O4YDjdxEazHCjJiRE55UITgaWQDGSeUoE5aJIXpJA6xyBSUmaSYoMTDZwWJAGs6QDddL5r14QIfqNWlS9CuMyapvWKpBgnjHBJA3r9B102rbMh3Z4CYEBTESjSUYVrvHemVGtXrTL3oTCofbuqa1eFdtVXu2oblq4O1m2-Mvpn5bvOANAO8EGyc-N-b_9j-wm6b4Lj</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Leone, Thomas</creator><creator>Nordas, Alexandros N.</creator><creator>Anagnostou, Georgios</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2863-4892</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Effects of Creep on Shield Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground</title><author>Leone, Thomas ; Nordas, Alexandros N. ; Anagnostou, Georgios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-ed4b032b2e6b356d261767407b936150d2bc2c7db10692fa731e18d053c2801d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Boring machines</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Compressing</topic><topic>Constitutive models</topic><topic>Damage assessment</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Dredging</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Excavation</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Jamming</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Solifluction</topic><topic>Time dependence</topic><topic>Tunnel construction</topic><topic>Tunneling</topic><topic>Tunneling shields</topic><topic>Tunnels</topic><topic>Viscosity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leone, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nordas, Alexandros N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anagnostou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leone, Thomas</au><au>Nordas, Alexandros N.</au><au>Anagnostou, Georgios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Creep on Shield Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground</atitle><jtitle>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</jtitle><stitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</stitle><addtitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>351</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>351-374</pages><issn>0723-2632</issn><eissn>1434-453X</eissn><abstract>The present work aims to improve the reliability of shield jamming and lining damage risk assessment in squeezing ground by analysing the effects of creep on the evolution of rock pressure over time. The study is based on numerical simulations of typical mechanised tunnelling processes, generally consisting of shield advance phases alternating with shorter or longer standstills for lining installation, maintenance, etc . A linear elastic—viscous plastic constitutive model based upon Perzyna’s overstress theory is employed, which considers the time-dependency of plastic deformations via a single viscosity parameter. The investigations demonstrate the following: (i) shield loading during advance increases with increasing viscosity under certain conditions, which contradicts the common perception in many existing works that creep is thoroughly favourable for shield jamming; (ii) creep is thoroughly unfavourable for shield loading during long standstills and long-term lining loading, due to the additional viscoplastic ground deformations manifested over time; (iii) the commonly adopted simplifying assumption of continuous excavation with the gross advance rate is adequate only where standstills are very short (e.g., for lining erection during the stop-and-go shield tunnelling process), but otherwise underestimates the shield loading, even in cases of regular inspection and maintenance standstills lasting only a few hours. Two application examples, the Fréjus safety gallery and the Gotthard Base tunnel, demonstrate the need to consider creep and the accuracy of modelling tunnel construction by a semi-discrete approach, where only the very short standstills for lining erection are considered via an average advance rate, but longer standstills are explicitly simulated. Highlights Assessment of the effect of creep on TBM shield loading. Assessment of the effect of creep on long-term lining loading. Analysis of a counter-intuitive, adverse effect of advance rate on shield loading. Discussion of alternative methods of considering excavation standstills. Development of a semi-discrete model for estimating shield loading during standstills.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><pmid>38188540</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00603-023-03505-x</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2863-4892</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0723-2632
ispartof Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 2024, Vol.57 (1), p.351-374
issn 0723-2632
1434-453X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2911842573
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Boring machines
Civil Engineering
Compressing
Constitutive models
Damage assessment
Deformation
Dredging
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Excavation
Geophysics/Geodesy
Inspection
Jamming
Maintenance
Mathematical models
Model accuracy
Original Paper
Risk assessment
Solifluction
Time dependence
Tunnel construction
Tunneling
Tunneling shields
Tunnels
Viscosity
title Effects of Creep on Shield Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A21%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Creep%20on%20Shield%20Tunnelling%20Through%20Squeezing%20Ground&rft.jtitle=Rock%20mechanics%20and%20rock%20engineering&rft.au=Leone,%20Thomas&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=351&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=351-374&rft.issn=0723-2632&rft.eissn=1434-453X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00603-023-03505-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2910040396%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2910040396&rft_id=info:pmid/38188540&rfr_iscdi=true