Effects of Creep on Shield Tunnelling Through Squeezing Ground

The present work aims to improve the reliability of shield jamming and lining damage risk assessment in squeezing ground by analysing the effects of creep on the evolution of rock pressure over time. The study is based on numerical simulations of typical mechanised tunnelling processes, generally co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rock mechanics and rock engineering 2024, Vol.57 (1), p.351-374
Hauptverfasser: Leone, Thomas, Nordas, Alexandros N., Anagnostou, Georgios
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The present work aims to improve the reliability of shield jamming and lining damage risk assessment in squeezing ground by analysing the effects of creep on the evolution of rock pressure over time. The study is based on numerical simulations of typical mechanised tunnelling processes, generally consisting of shield advance phases alternating with shorter or longer standstills for lining installation, maintenance, etc . A linear elastic—viscous plastic constitutive model based upon Perzyna’s overstress theory is employed, which considers the time-dependency of plastic deformations via a single viscosity parameter. The investigations demonstrate the following: (i) shield loading during advance increases with increasing viscosity under certain conditions, which contradicts the common perception in many existing works that creep is thoroughly favourable for shield jamming; (ii) creep is thoroughly unfavourable for shield loading during long standstills and long-term lining loading, due to the additional viscoplastic ground deformations manifested over time; (iii) the commonly adopted simplifying assumption of continuous excavation with the gross advance rate is adequate only where standstills are very short (e.g., for lining erection during the stop-and-go shield tunnelling process), but otherwise underestimates the shield loading, even in cases of regular inspection and maintenance standstills lasting only a few hours. Two application examples, the Fréjus safety gallery and the Gotthard Base tunnel, demonstrate the need to consider creep and the accuracy of modelling tunnel construction by a semi-discrete approach, where only the very short standstills for lining erection are considered via an average advance rate, but longer standstills are explicitly simulated. Highlights Assessment of the effect of creep on TBM shield loading. Assessment of the effect of creep on long-term lining loading. Analysis of a counter-intuitive, adverse effect of advance rate on shield loading. Discussion of alternative methods of considering excavation standstills. Development of a semi-discrete model for estimating shield loading during standstills.
ISSN:0723-2632
1434-453X
DOI:10.1007/s00603-023-03505-x