Automated External Defibrillators Are Only Effective If Put to Use

In their cohort study, Kolkailah et al found that rates of bystander automated external defibrillator (AED) use were similarly low in both states that mandate and those that do not mandate such devices in recreational facilities: 19% vs 18%. The fact that cardiac arrests with ventricular tachycardia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of internal medicine (1960) 2024-02, Vol.184 (2), p.220-220
Hauptverfasser: Ostrer, Isabel, Wang, Tracy Y
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In their cohort study, Kolkailah et al found that rates of bystander automated external defibrillator (AED) use were similarly low in both states that mandate and those that do not mandate such devices in recreational facilities: 19% vs 18%. The fact that cardiac arrests with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation rhythms have significantly better odds of survival when early cardiopulmonary resuscitation is performed has likely motivated policies to expand AED availability. However, availability alone does not guarantee appropriate use by bystanders.
ISSN:2168-6106
2168-6114
DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.7252