A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 3-Dimensional Morphometric Parameters for Cerebral Aneurysms
Imaging modalities with increased spatial resolution have allowed for more precise quantification of cerebral aneurysm shape in 3-dimensional (3D) space. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the correlation of individual 3D morphometric measures with cerebral aneurysm rupture...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2024-03, Vol.183, p.214-226.e5 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Imaging modalities with increased spatial resolution have allowed for more precise quantification of cerebral aneurysm shape in 3-dimensional (3D) space. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the correlation of individual 3D morphometric measures with cerebral aneurysm rupture status.
Two independent reviewers performed a PRISMA (preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analysis)-guided literature search to identify articles reporting the association between 3D morphometric measures of intracranial aneurysms and rupture status.
A total of 15,122 articles were identified. After screening, 39 studies were included. We identified 17 3D morphometric measures, with 11 eligible for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed a significant association with rupture status for the following measures: nonsphericity index (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53–0.79; P < 0.0001; I2 = 55.2%), undulation index (SMD, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.26–0.85; P = 0.0017; I2 = 68.1%), ellipticity index (SMD, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29–0.77; P = 0.0005; I2 = 70.8%), volume (SMD, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02–0.35; P = 0.0320; I2 = 82.3%), volume/ostium ratio (SMD, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.16–0.71; P = 0.0075; I2 = 90.4%), elongation (SMD, −0.94; 95% CI, −1.12 to −0.76; P = 0.0005; I2 = 0%), flatness (SMD, −0.87; 95% CI, −1.04 to −0.71; P = 0.0005; I2 = 0%), and sphericity (SMD, −0.62; 95% CI, −1.06 to −0.17; P = 0.0215; I2 = 67.9%). A significant risk of publication bias was estimated for the ellipticity index (P = 0.0360) and volume (P = 0.0030).
Based on the results of a meta-analysis containing 39 studies, the nonsphericity index, undulation index, elongation, flatness, and sphericity demonstrated the most consistent correlation with rupture status.
[Display omitted] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1878-8750 1878-8769 1878-8769 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.131 |