Expanded disability status scale by phone BR: Brazilian Portuguese validation
•The “EDSS by phone” scale translated to Brazilian Portuguese presented an excellent reliability between in-person and telephone-based assessments.•It was better performing in patients with higher EDSS, where the scores are more reliant on walking impairment.•It holds significant value for patients...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Multiple sclerosis and related disorders 2024-02, Vol.82, p.105388-105388, Article 105388 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •The “EDSS by phone” scale translated to Brazilian Portuguese presented an excellent reliability between in-person and telephone-based assessments.•It was better performing in patients with higher EDSS, where the scores are more reliant on walking impairment.•It holds significant value for patients unable to attend appointments due to various circumstances.
The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is widely used and accepted by regulatory agencies for the assessment of neurological disability secondary to Multiple Sclerosis. The "Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) by phone" was developed to be a patient-reported telephone-based alternative for the assessment of EDSS functional system scores when a physical examination is not possible. The scale has been validated in multiple languages; however, its reliability has not been assessed in Brazilian Portuguese.
After cross-cultural translation and adaptation, 57 people with MS with a recent in-person visit (±6 months) were invited to answer the EDSS by phone scale on two occasions, 15 days apart. The agreement between scales (in-person and telephone-based) and between telephone-based assessments was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for absolute agreement and weighted Kappa coefficients.
An excellent reliability was obtained for the agreement between the in-person and telephone assessments (ICC: 0.95, 95 %CI 0.92–0.97, Kappa: 0.83, 95 %CI 0.78–0.89) and between telephone-based assessments (ICC: 0.99, 95 %CI 0.98–0.99, Kappa: 0.93, 95 %CI 0.88–0.97). After stratification by disability level, the agreement between scales was less pronounced for subjects with an EDSS ≤ 4.0.
this study offers evidence that supports the validity of the EDSS by phone questionnaire translated into Brazilian Portuguese, particularly for patients with higher EDSS scores. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2211-0348 2211-0356 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105388 |