Insulin resistance is associated with the presence and severity of retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes

Background To assess the relationship between novel insulin resistance (IR) indices and the presence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods This is a cross‐sectional study involving 2211 patients. The study outcomes were DR events. The study exposures wer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical & experimental ophthalmology 2024-01, Vol.52 (1), p.63-77
Hauptverfasser: Xu, Yu‐Xin, Pu, Sheng‐Dan, Zhang, Yi‐Tong, Tong, Xue‐Wei, Sun, Xiao‐Tong, Shan, Yong‐Yan, Gao, Xin‐Yuan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background To assess the relationship between novel insulin resistance (IR) indices and the presence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods This is a cross‐sectional study involving 2211 patients. The study outcomes were DR events. The study exposures were IR indices including estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), natural logarithm of glucose disposal rate (lnGDR), metabolic insulin resistance score (METS‐IR), triglyceride glucose index‐body mass index (TyG‐BMI), triglyceride glucose index‐waist‐to‐hip ratio (TyG‐WHR), and triglyceride/high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol(TG/HDL‐c ratio). We used binary and multivariate ordered logistic regression models to estimate the association between different IR indices and the presence and severity of DR. Subject work characteristic curves were used to assess the predictive power of different IR indices for DR. Results DR was present in 25.4% of participants. After adjusting for all covariates, per standard deviation (SD) increases in eGDR (ratio [OR] 0.38 [95% CI 0.32–0.44]), lnGDR (0.34 [0.27–0.42]) were negatively associated with the presence of DR. In contrast, per SD increases in METS‐IR (1.97 [1.70–2.28]), TyG‐BMI (1.94 [1.68–2.25]), TyG‐WHR (2.34 [2.01–2.72]) and TG/HDL‐c ratio (1.21 [1.08–1.36]) were positively associated with the presence of DR. eGDR was strongly associated with severity of DR. Of all variables, eGDR had the strongest diagnostic value for DR (AUC = 0.757). Conclusions Of the six IR indices, eGDR was significantly associated with the presence and severity of DR in patients with type 2 diabetes. eGDR has a good predictive value for DR. Thus, eGDR maybe a stronger marker of DR.
ISSN:1442-6404
1442-9071
DOI:10.1111/ceo.14344