Quo vadis, esthetic dentistry? Part II: Composite resin overtreatment and social media appeal
Objectives This article presents case reports highlighting over‐treatments with resin composites, often misconceived as minimally invasive procedures. Clinical Considerations Tooth‐colored restorative materials, such as ceramics and composites, have found widespread application to correct problems r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2024-01, Vol.36 (1), p.32-36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
This article presents case reports highlighting over‐treatments with resin composites, often misconceived as minimally invasive procedures.
Clinical Considerations
Tooth‐colored restorative materials, such as ceramics and composites, have found widespread application to correct problems related to tooth color, shape, and alignment. When composite resin is used, these procedures can be done in a very conservative, cost‐effective, and timely fashion. However, it is noteworthy that contemporary dental esthetic expectations are based on standards propagated by social media and other marketing and communications platforms. The abuse of and addiction to social media impacts can lead to unrealistic esthetic expectations and standards for both patients and dentists.
Conclusions
After a critical discussion on ceramic veneers published in part I of this 2‐part series, this article directs attention towards what has become a trendy fashion, i.e., the use of direct composite resins as “non‐prep” veneers in clinical situations that arguably required no restorative intervention at all. We further explore how social media influences the decision‐making processes of both professionals and patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1496-4155 1708-8240 1708-8240 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jerd.13162 |