Current opinions on the management of prolonged ischemic priapism: does penoscrotal decompression outperform corporoglanular tunneling?

Prolonged ischemic priapism presents a treatment challenge given the difficulty in achieving detumescence and effects on sexual function. To evaluate current practice patterns, an open, web-based multi-institutional survey querying surgeons’ experience with and perceived efficacy of tunneling maneuv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of impotence research 2024-02, Vol.36 (1), p.62-67
Hauptverfasser: VanDyke, Maia E., Smith, Wesley J., Holland, Levi C., Langford, Brian T., Joshi, Eshan G., Dropkin, Benjamin M., Breyer, Benjamin N., Yafi, Faysal A., Johnsen, Niels V., Barham, David W., Joice, Gregory A., Fode, Mikkel, Franzen, Bryce P., Hudak, Steven J., Morey, Allen F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Prolonged ischemic priapism presents a treatment challenge given the difficulty in achieving detumescence and effects on sexual function. To evaluate current practice patterns, an open, web-based multi-institutional survey querying surgeons’ experience with and perceived efficacy of tunneling maneuvers (corporoglanular tunneling and penoscrotal decompression), as well as impressions of erectile recovery, was administered to members of societies specializing in male genital surgery. Following distribution, 141 responses were received. Tunneling procedures were the favored first-line surgical intervention in the prolonged setting (99/139, 71.2% tunneling vs. 14/139, 10.1% implant, p  
ISSN:0955-9930
1476-5489
DOI:10.1038/s41443-023-00808-z