Volumetric changes in post hemiglossectomy reconstruction with anterolateral thigh free flap versus radial forearm free flap
The volume of the reconstructed tongue is considered a critical factor for tongue function. Studies investigating the difference in volume loss between the anterolateral thigh free flap (ALTF) and radial forearm free flap (RFFF) used in reconstruction of the tongue after hemiglossectomy are lacking....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2024-06, Vol.53 (6), p.470-474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The volume of the reconstructed tongue is considered a critical factor for tongue function. Studies investigating the difference in volume loss between the anterolateral thigh free flap (ALTF) and radial forearm free flap (RFFF) used in reconstruction of the tongue after hemiglossectomy are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a significant difference in shrinkage between these two flaps. This was a retrospective study of all patients treated for tongue cancer by hemiglossectomy who underwent either ALTF or RFFF reconstruction at the University of Florida College of Medicine between January 2018 and April 2022. Computed tomography scans were used to measure the volumetric changes in the ALTF and RFFF at two time points over a 6-month period. Of the 85 patients assessed, 10 fulfilled the inclusion criteria: five were reconstructed with an ALTF and five with a RFFF. All underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. The mean ALTF percentage shrinkage was 39.6% ± 3.9%, while for the RFFF it was 51.1% ± 6.2% (P = 0.008). Therefore, it is recommended that the difference in volume loss between the two flaps is taken into consideration. It is suggested that in hemiglossectomy cases, the ALTF is made 1.4 times larger than the defect, while the RFFF is made 1.5 times larger. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0901-5027 1399-0020 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.12.003 |