An assessment of a biosensor system for the quantification of microcystins in freshwater cyanobacterial blooms

Microcystin-producing cyanobacterial blooms are a global issue threatening drinking water supplies and recreation on lakes and beaches. Direct measurement of microcystins is the only way to ensure waters have concentrations below guideline concentrations; however, analyzing water for microcystins ta...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical biochemistry 2024-04, Vol.687, p.115429-115429, Article 115429
Hauptverfasser: Chaffin, Justin D, Barker, Katelyn B, Bickman, Sarah R, Bratton, John F, Bridgeman, Thomas B, Bhatia, Mudit, Buchholz, Seth D, Bullerjahn, George S, Johengen, Thomas H, Kang, Dae-Wook, Lewis, Gregory G, Lochhead, Michael J, Macdonald, Brooks M, Petrou, Cassandra L, Platz, Michelle, Purcell, Heidi, Roser, Jack, Seo, Youngwoo, Siddiquee, Mashuk, Snyder, Brenda, Taylor, Autumn T, Verhamme, Edward M, Westrick, Judy A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Microcystin-producing cyanobacterial blooms are a global issue threatening drinking water supplies and recreation on lakes and beaches. Direct measurement of microcystins is the only way to ensure waters have concentrations below guideline concentrations; however, analyzing water for microcystins takes several hours to days to obtain data. We tested LightDeck Diagnostics' bead beater cell lysis and two versions of the quantification system designed to give microcystin concentrations within 20 min and compared it to the standard freeze-thaw cycle lysis method and ELISA quantification. The bead beater lyser was only 30 % effective at extracting microcystins compared to freeze-thaw. When considering freeze-thaw samples analyzed in 2021, there was good agreement between ELISA and LightDeck version 2 (n = 152; R  = 0.868), but the LightDeck slightly underestimated microcystins (slope of 0.862). However, we found poor relationships between LightDeck version 2 and ELISA in 2022 (n = 49, slopes 0.60 to 1.6; R  
ISSN:0003-2697
1096-0309
DOI:10.1016/j.ab.2023.115429