Similar effectiveness with primary HPV and cytology screening - Long-term follow-up of randomized cervical cancer screening trial

Long-term effects of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality are still missing. We conducted a long-term follow-up of the Finnish randomized HPV screening trial, the first HPV screening trial run within the routine screening program, to assess these measures. During 2003–2008, over 236,000 individuals were randomized (1:1) to HPV and cytology screening arms in Southern Finland. To compare the study arms, we calculated the cervical cancer incidence and mortality rate ratios using Poisson regression. During a total of 3.5 million person-years of follow-up, we observed 129 cervical cancers and 32 cervical cancer deaths in the cytology arm, 139 cervical cancers and 32 cervical cancer deaths in the HPV arm. Compared to the cytology arm, in the HPV arm, the incidence rate ratio was 1.08 (95% CI 0.85–1.37), and the mortality rate ratio was 1.01 (95% CI 0.61–1.64). We studied the effects of HPV screening on both cervical cancer incidence and mortality for the first time in a setting with an already well-established, high-quality cytology screening program. In this kind of setting with a low incidence of cervical cancer, HPV and cytology screening showed similar effectiveness. HPV screening provides, however, an objective, validated test system and enables self-sampling which can improve screening coverage. More attention is needed yet to ensure the balance between the harms and benefits of HPV screening. [Display omitted] •We studied the effects of HPV screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality for the first time within an already well-established cytology screening program•In the intention to screen and per protocol analyses, HPV and cytology screening showed similar effectiveness•In a setting, where cytology screening works well HPV screening does not necessarily improve the screening effectiveness