Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)

Rationale The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.e9655-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Subbaraj, Arvind K., Deb‐choudhury, Santanu, Pavan, Enrique, Realini, Carolina E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 1
container_start_page e9655
container_title Rapid communications in mass spectrometry
container_volume 38
creator Subbaraj, Arvind K.
Deb‐choudhury, Santanu
Pavan, Enrique
Realini, Carolina E.
description Rationale The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan fry are three cooking methods of beef commonly practised by chefs. Near real‐time analysis of volatile compounds from these three cooking methods will provide insight into respective volatile fingerprints and help improve cooking techniques. Methods Volatile compounds from three beef cooking methods were captured using an in‐house sol–gel based solid phase microextraction (SPME) method and analysed using direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS). A volatile organic compound (VOC) standard was used to demonstrate successful implementation of the sol–gel coating technique. Volatile features discriminating the three cooking methods were shortlisted and statistically assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The VOC standard was successfully adsorbed by the sol–gel method and detected by DART‐MS. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly demarcated three beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. Out of 65 significant features differentiating the cooking methods, 50 were at highest concentrations from pan‐fry cooking only, followed by 14 with highest concentrations from oven cooking followed by pan frying. Sous vide followed by pan frying showed lowest concentrations of almost all volatile features. Conclusions The sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction technique combined with DART‐MS was successful in differentiating beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. A workflow for rapid assessment of the volatile profile from beef cooking methods was established, providing a baseline to further explore volatile profiles from other key ingredients.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/rcm.9655
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902937555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2900143912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-ba3662d25df0d56189e38854922ce03b8d0a6fbd153471e02576811d19f3b93e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EoktB4gmQJS7bQ8rYXifxsVrKH6krUFu4Rk48aV2SeOtJBHvjEZB4DN6KJ8FpC0hIXGx_4998ludj7KmAQwEgX8SmPzS51vfYQoApMpBK3GcLMFpkK2HKPfaI6ApACC3hIdtTJRRKglqwHx9DZ0ffIW_9cIFxG_0wEg8trxFb3oTwKdV5j-NlcMQnmhWF7ufX7xeY1m-1JXRzxbuktpdJ8t43MeCXMdpm9GHgy7P3m-MDbgfHnY_YjOloux154n7gEe1sNPo-dVoiTtuExJDejDu-fHl0ep6uN2cHj9mD1naET-72ffbh1fH5-k128u712_XRSdaoUumstirPpZPateB0LkqDqiz1ykjZIKi6dGDztnZCq1UhEKQu8lIIJ0yraqNQ7bPlre82husJaax6Tw12nR0wTFRJA9KoQmud0Of_oFdhiulzNxSIlTJC_jVMYyGK2FZpzL2Nu0pANQdYpQCrOcCEPrsznOoe3R_wd2IJyG6Bzym03X-NqtP15sbwF2izqgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2900143912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Subbaraj, Arvind K. ; Deb‐choudhury, Santanu ; Pavan, Enrique ; Realini, Carolina E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Subbaraj, Arvind K. ; Deb‐choudhury, Santanu ; Pavan, Enrique ; Realini, Carolina E.</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan fry are three cooking methods of beef commonly practised by chefs. Near real‐time analysis of volatile compounds from these three cooking methods will provide insight into respective volatile fingerprints and help improve cooking techniques. Methods Volatile compounds from three beef cooking methods were captured using an in‐house sol–gel based solid phase microextraction (SPME) method and analysed using direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS). A volatile organic compound (VOC) standard was used to demonstrate successful implementation of the sol–gel coating technique. Volatile features discriminating the three cooking methods were shortlisted and statistically assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The VOC standard was successfully adsorbed by the sol–gel method and detected by DART‐MS. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly demarcated three beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. Out of 65 significant features differentiating the cooking methods, 50 were at highest concentrations from pan‐fry cooking only, followed by 14 with highest concentrations from oven cooking followed by pan frying. Sous vide followed by pan frying showed lowest concentrations of almost all volatile features. Conclusions The sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction technique combined with DART‐MS was successful in differentiating beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. A workflow for rapid assessment of the volatile profile from beef cooking methods was established, providing a baseline to further explore volatile profiles from other key ingredients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-4198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rcm.9655</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38073203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aroma ; Assessments ; Beef ; Cluster analysis ; Cooking ; Fingerprints ; Food ; Frying ; Mass spectrometry ; Scientific imaging ; Sol-gel processes ; Solid phases ; VOCs ; Volatile compounds ; Volatile organic compounds ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.e9655-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-ba3662d25df0d56189e38854922ce03b8d0a6fbd153471e02576811d19f3b93e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-ba3662d25df0d56189e38854922ce03b8d0a6fbd153471e02576811d19f3b93e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8868-2258</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frcm.9655$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frcm.9655$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38073203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Subbaraj, Arvind K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb‐choudhury, Santanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavan, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Realini, Carolina E.</creatorcontrib><title>Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)</title><title>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</title><addtitle>Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom</addtitle><description>Rationale The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan fry are three cooking methods of beef commonly practised by chefs. Near real‐time analysis of volatile compounds from these three cooking methods will provide insight into respective volatile fingerprints and help improve cooking techniques. Methods Volatile compounds from three beef cooking methods were captured using an in‐house sol–gel based solid phase microextraction (SPME) method and analysed using direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS). A volatile organic compound (VOC) standard was used to demonstrate successful implementation of the sol–gel coating technique. Volatile features discriminating the three cooking methods were shortlisted and statistically assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The VOC standard was successfully adsorbed by the sol–gel method and detected by DART‐MS. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly demarcated three beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. Out of 65 significant features differentiating the cooking methods, 50 were at highest concentrations from pan‐fry cooking only, followed by 14 with highest concentrations from oven cooking followed by pan frying. Sous vide followed by pan frying showed lowest concentrations of almost all volatile features. Conclusions The sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction technique combined with DART‐MS was successful in differentiating beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. A workflow for rapid assessment of the volatile profile from beef cooking methods was established, providing a baseline to further explore volatile profiles from other key ingredients.</description><subject>Aroma</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Fingerprints</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Frying</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Sol-gel processes</subject><subject>Solid phases</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>0951-4198</issn><issn>1097-0231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EoktB4gmQJS7bQ8rYXifxsVrKH6krUFu4Rk48aV2SeOtJBHvjEZB4DN6KJ8FpC0hIXGx_4998ludj7KmAQwEgX8SmPzS51vfYQoApMpBK3GcLMFpkK2HKPfaI6ApACC3hIdtTJRRKglqwHx9DZ0ffIW_9cIFxG_0wEg8trxFb3oTwKdV5j-NlcMQnmhWF7ufX7xeY1m-1JXRzxbuktpdJ8t43MeCXMdpm9GHgy7P3m-MDbgfHnY_YjOloux154n7gEe1sNPo-dVoiTtuExJDejDu-fHl0ep6uN2cHj9mD1naET-72ffbh1fH5-k128u712_XRSdaoUumstirPpZPateB0LkqDqiz1ykjZIKi6dGDztnZCq1UhEKQu8lIIJ0yraqNQ7bPlre82husJaax6Tw12nR0wTFRJA9KoQmud0Of_oFdhiulzNxSIlTJC_jVMYyGK2FZpzL2Nu0pANQdYpQCrOcCEPrsznOoe3R_wd2IJyG6Bzym03X-NqtP15sbwF2izqgA</recordid><startdate>20240115</startdate><enddate>20240115</enddate><creator>Subbaraj, Arvind K.</creator><creator>Deb‐choudhury, Santanu</creator><creator>Pavan, Enrique</creator><creator>Realini, Carolina E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-2258</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240115</creationdate><title>Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)</title><author>Subbaraj, Arvind K. ; Deb‐choudhury, Santanu ; Pavan, Enrique ; Realini, Carolina E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-ba3662d25df0d56189e38854922ce03b8d0a6fbd153471e02576811d19f3b93e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aroma</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Fingerprints</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Frying</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Sol-gel processes</topic><topic>Solid phases</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Subbaraj, Arvind K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb‐choudhury, Santanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavan, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Realini, Carolina E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Subbaraj, Arvind K.</au><au>Deb‐choudhury, Santanu</au><au>Pavan, Enrique</au><au>Realini, Carolina E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)</atitle><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle><addtitle>Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom</addtitle><date>2024-01-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e9655</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e9655-n/a</pages><issn>0951-4198</issn><eissn>1097-0231</eissn><abstract>Rationale The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan fry are three cooking methods of beef commonly practised by chefs. Near real‐time analysis of volatile compounds from these three cooking methods will provide insight into respective volatile fingerprints and help improve cooking techniques. Methods Volatile compounds from three beef cooking methods were captured using an in‐house sol–gel based solid phase microextraction (SPME) method and analysed using direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS). A volatile organic compound (VOC) standard was used to demonstrate successful implementation of the sol–gel coating technique. Volatile features discriminating the three cooking methods were shortlisted and statistically assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The VOC standard was successfully adsorbed by the sol–gel method and detected by DART‐MS. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly demarcated three beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. Out of 65 significant features differentiating the cooking methods, 50 were at highest concentrations from pan‐fry cooking only, followed by 14 with highest concentrations from oven cooking followed by pan frying. Sous vide followed by pan frying showed lowest concentrations of almost all volatile features. Conclusions The sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction technique combined with DART‐MS was successful in differentiating beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. A workflow for rapid assessment of the volatile profile from beef cooking methods was established, providing a baseline to further explore volatile profiles from other key ingredients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38073203</pmid><doi>10.1002/rcm.9655</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-2258</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-4198
ispartof Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.e9655-n/a
issn 0951-4198
1097-0231
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902937555
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aroma
Assessments
Beef
Cluster analysis
Cooking
Fingerprints
Food
Frying
Mass spectrometry
Scientific imaging
Sol-gel processes
Solid phases
VOCs
Volatile compounds
Volatile organic compounds
Workflow
title Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Volatile%20fingerprints%20of%20beef%20cooking%20methods%20using%20sol%E2%80%93gel%E2%80%90based%20solid%E2%80%90phase%20microextraction%20(SPME)%20and%20direct%20analysis%20in%20real%E2%80%90time%20mass%20spectrometry%20(DART%E2%80%90MS)&rft.jtitle=Rapid%20communications%20in%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.au=Subbaraj,%20Arvind%20K.&rft.date=2024-01-15&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e9655&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e9655-n/a&rft.issn=0951-4198&rft.eissn=1097-0231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rcm.9655&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2900143912%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2900143912&rft_id=info:pmid/38073203&rfr_iscdi=true