Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)
Rationale The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.e9655-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e9655 |
container_title | Rapid communications in mass spectrometry |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Subbaraj, Arvind K. Deb‐choudhury, Santanu Pavan, Enrique Realini, Carolina E. |
description | Rationale
The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan fry are three cooking methods of beef commonly practised by chefs. Near real‐time analysis of volatile compounds from these three cooking methods will provide insight into respective volatile fingerprints and help improve cooking techniques.
Methods
Volatile compounds from three beef cooking methods were captured using an in‐house sol–gel based solid phase microextraction (SPME) method and analysed using direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS). A volatile organic compound (VOC) standard was used to demonstrate successful implementation of the sol–gel coating technique. Volatile features discriminating the three cooking methods were shortlisted and statistically assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results
The VOC standard was successfully adsorbed by the sol–gel method and detected by DART‐MS. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly demarcated three beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. Out of 65 significant features differentiating the cooking methods, 50 were at highest concentrations from pan‐fry cooking only, followed by 14 with highest concentrations from oven cooking followed by pan frying. Sous vide followed by pan frying showed lowest concentrations of almost all volatile features.
Conclusions
The sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction technique combined with DART‐MS was successful in differentiating beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. A workflow for rapid assessment of the volatile profile from beef cooking methods was established, providing a baseline to further explore volatile profiles from other key ingredients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rcm.9655 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902937555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2900143912</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-ba3662d25df0d56189e38854922ce03b8d0a6fbd153471e02576811d19f3b93e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EoktB4gmQJS7bQ8rYXifxsVrKH6krUFu4Rk48aV2SeOtJBHvjEZB4DN6KJ8FpC0hIXGx_4998ludj7KmAQwEgX8SmPzS51vfYQoApMpBK3GcLMFpkK2HKPfaI6ApACC3hIdtTJRRKglqwHx9DZ0ffIW_9cIFxG_0wEg8trxFb3oTwKdV5j-NlcMQnmhWF7ufX7xeY1m-1JXRzxbuktpdJ8t43MeCXMdpm9GHgy7P3m-MDbgfHnY_YjOloux154n7gEe1sNPo-dVoiTtuExJDejDu-fHl0ep6uN2cHj9mD1naET-72ffbh1fH5-k128u712_XRSdaoUumstirPpZPateB0LkqDqiz1ykjZIKi6dGDztnZCq1UhEKQu8lIIJ0yraqNQ7bPlre82husJaax6Tw12nR0wTFRJA9KoQmud0Of_oFdhiulzNxSIlTJC_jVMYyGK2FZpzL2Nu0pANQdYpQCrOcCEPrsznOoe3R_wd2IJyG6Bzym03X-NqtP15sbwF2izqgA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2900143912</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Subbaraj, Arvind K. ; Deb‐choudhury, Santanu ; Pavan, Enrique ; Realini, Carolina E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Subbaraj, Arvind K. ; Deb‐choudhury, Santanu ; Pavan, Enrique ; Realini, Carolina E.</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale
The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan fry are three cooking methods of beef commonly practised by chefs. Near real‐time analysis of volatile compounds from these three cooking methods will provide insight into respective volatile fingerprints and help improve cooking techniques.
Methods
Volatile compounds from three beef cooking methods were captured using an in‐house sol–gel based solid phase microextraction (SPME) method and analysed using direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS). A volatile organic compound (VOC) standard was used to demonstrate successful implementation of the sol–gel coating technique. Volatile features discriminating the three cooking methods were shortlisted and statistically assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results
The VOC standard was successfully adsorbed by the sol–gel method and detected by DART‐MS. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly demarcated three beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. Out of 65 significant features differentiating the cooking methods, 50 were at highest concentrations from pan‐fry cooking only, followed by 14 with highest concentrations from oven cooking followed by pan frying. Sous vide followed by pan frying showed lowest concentrations of almost all volatile features.
Conclusions
The sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction technique combined with DART‐MS was successful in differentiating beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. A workflow for rapid assessment of the volatile profile from beef cooking methods was established, providing a baseline to further explore volatile profiles from other key ingredients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-4198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0231</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rcm.9655</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38073203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aroma ; Assessments ; Beef ; Cluster analysis ; Cooking ; Fingerprints ; Food ; Frying ; Mass spectrometry ; Scientific imaging ; Sol-gel processes ; Solid phases ; VOCs ; Volatile compounds ; Volatile organic compounds ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.e9655-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-ba3662d25df0d56189e38854922ce03b8d0a6fbd153471e02576811d19f3b93e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-ba3662d25df0d56189e38854922ce03b8d0a6fbd153471e02576811d19f3b93e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8868-2258</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frcm.9655$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frcm.9655$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27915,27916,45565,45566</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38073203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Subbaraj, Arvind K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb‐choudhury, Santanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavan, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Realini, Carolina E.</creatorcontrib><title>Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)</title><title>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</title><addtitle>Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom</addtitle><description>Rationale
The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan fry are three cooking methods of beef commonly practised by chefs. Near real‐time analysis of volatile compounds from these three cooking methods will provide insight into respective volatile fingerprints and help improve cooking techniques.
Methods
Volatile compounds from three beef cooking methods were captured using an in‐house sol–gel based solid phase microextraction (SPME) method and analysed using direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS). A volatile organic compound (VOC) standard was used to demonstrate successful implementation of the sol–gel coating technique. Volatile features discriminating the three cooking methods were shortlisted and statistically assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results
The VOC standard was successfully adsorbed by the sol–gel method and detected by DART‐MS. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly demarcated three beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. Out of 65 significant features differentiating the cooking methods, 50 were at highest concentrations from pan‐fry cooking only, followed by 14 with highest concentrations from oven cooking followed by pan frying. Sous vide followed by pan frying showed lowest concentrations of almost all volatile features.
Conclusions
The sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction technique combined with DART‐MS was successful in differentiating beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. A workflow for rapid assessment of the volatile profile from beef cooking methods was established, providing a baseline to further explore volatile profiles from other key ingredients.</description><subject>Aroma</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Cooking</subject><subject>Fingerprints</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Frying</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Sol-gel processes</subject><subject>Solid phases</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>0951-4198</issn><issn>1097-0231</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EoktB4gmQJS7bQ8rYXifxsVrKH6krUFu4Rk48aV2SeOtJBHvjEZB4DN6KJ8FpC0hIXGx_4998ludj7KmAQwEgX8SmPzS51vfYQoApMpBK3GcLMFpkK2HKPfaI6ApACC3hIdtTJRRKglqwHx9DZ0ffIW_9cIFxG_0wEg8trxFb3oTwKdV5j-NlcMQnmhWF7ufX7xeY1m-1JXRzxbuktpdJ8t43MeCXMdpm9GHgy7P3m-MDbgfHnY_YjOloux154n7gEe1sNPo-dVoiTtuExJDejDu-fHl0ep6uN2cHj9mD1naET-72ffbh1fH5-k128u712_XRSdaoUumstirPpZPateB0LkqDqiz1ykjZIKi6dGDztnZCq1UhEKQu8lIIJ0yraqNQ7bPlre82husJaax6Tw12nR0wTFRJA9KoQmud0Of_oFdhiulzNxSIlTJC_jVMYyGK2FZpzL2Nu0pANQdYpQCrOcCEPrsznOoe3R_wd2IJyG6Bzym03X-NqtP15sbwF2izqgA</recordid><startdate>20240115</startdate><enddate>20240115</enddate><creator>Subbaraj, Arvind K.</creator><creator>Deb‐choudhury, Santanu</creator><creator>Pavan, Enrique</creator><creator>Realini, Carolina E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-2258</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240115</creationdate><title>Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)</title><author>Subbaraj, Arvind K. ; Deb‐choudhury, Santanu ; Pavan, Enrique ; Realini, Carolina E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-ba3662d25df0d56189e38854922ce03b8d0a6fbd153471e02576811d19f3b93e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aroma</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Cooking</topic><topic>Fingerprints</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Frying</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Sol-gel processes</topic><topic>Solid phases</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Subbaraj, Arvind K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deb‐choudhury, Santanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavan, Enrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Realini, Carolina E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Subbaraj, Arvind K.</au><au>Deb‐choudhury, Santanu</au><au>Pavan, Enrique</au><au>Realini, Carolina E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)</atitle><jtitle>Rapid communications in mass spectrometry</jtitle><addtitle>Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom</addtitle><date>2024-01-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e9655</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e9655-n/a</pages><issn>0951-4198</issn><eissn>1097-0231</eissn><abstract>Rationale
The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan fry are three cooking methods of beef commonly practised by chefs. Near real‐time analysis of volatile compounds from these three cooking methods will provide insight into respective volatile fingerprints and help improve cooking techniques.
Methods
Volatile compounds from three beef cooking methods were captured using an in‐house sol–gel based solid phase microextraction (SPME) method and analysed using direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS). A volatile organic compound (VOC) standard was used to demonstrate successful implementation of the sol–gel coating technique. Volatile features discriminating the three cooking methods were shortlisted and statistically assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results
The VOC standard was successfully adsorbed by the sol–gel method and detected by DART‐MS. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly demarcated three beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. Out of 65 significant features differentiating the cooking methods, 50 were at highest concentrations from pan‐fry cooking only, followed by 14 with highest concentrations from oven cooking followed by pan frying. Sous vide followed by pan frying showed lowest concentrations of almost all volatile features.
Conclusions
The sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction technique combined with DART‐MS was successful in differentiating beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. A workflow for rapid assessment of the volatile profile from beef cooking methods was established, providing a baseline to further explore volatile profiles from other key ingredients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38073203</pmid><doi>10.1002/rcm.9655</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8868-2258</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-4198 |
ispartof | Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.e9655-n/a |
issn | 0951-4198 1097-0231 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2902937555 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aroma Assessments Beef Cluster analysis Cooking Fingerprints Food Frying Mass spectrometry Scientific imaging Sol-gel processes Solid phases VOCs Volatile compounds Volatile organic compounds Workflow |
title | Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T02%3A21%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Volatile%20fingerprints%20of%20beef%20cooking%20methods%20using%20sol%E2%80%93gel%E2%80%90based%20solid%E2%80%90phase%20microextraction%20(SPME)%20and%20direct%20analysis%20in%20real%E2%80%90time%20mass%20spectrometry%20(DART%E2%80%90MS)&rft.jtitle=Rapid%20communications%20in%20mass%20spectrometry&rft.au=Subbaraj,%20Arvind%20K.&rft.date=2024-01-15&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e9655&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e9655-n/a&rft.issn=0951-4198&rft.eissn=1097-0231&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rcm.9655&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2900143912%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2900143912&rft_id=info:pmid/38073203&rfr_iscdi=true |