Volatile fingerprints of beef cooking methods using sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction (SPME) and direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS)

Rationale The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rapid communications in mass spectrometry 2024-01, Vol.38 (1), p.e9655-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Subbaraj, Arvind K., Deb‐choudhury, Santanu, Pavan, Enrique, Realini, Carolina E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Rationale The aroma profile of food is a complex mixture of volatile compounds that constitutes a major component of the overall eating experience. The food service industry and chefs therefore constantly seek ways to investigate and thereby enhance the aroma profile. Oven cooking, sous vide and pan fry are three cooking methods of beef commonly practised by chefs. Near real‐time analysis of volatile compounds from these three cooking methods will provide insight into respective volatile fingerprints and help improve cooking techniques. Methods Volatile compounds from three beef cooking methods were captured using an in‐house sol–gel based solid phase microextraction (SPME) method and analysed using direct analysis in real‐time mass spectrometry (DART‐MS). A volatile organic compound (VOC) standard was used to demonstrate successful implementation of the sol–gel coating technique. Volatile features discriminating the three cooking methods were shortlisted and statistically assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results The VOC standard was successfully adsorbed by the sol–gel method and detected by DART‐MS. Hierarchical cluster analysis clearly demarcated three beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. Out of 65 significant features differentiating the cooking methods, 50 were at highest concentrations from pan‐fry cooking only, followed by 14 with highest concentrations from oven cooking followed by pan frying. Sous vide followed by pan frying showed lowest concentrations of almost all volatile features. Conclusions The sol–gel‐based solid‐phase microextraction technique combined with DART‐MS was successful in differentiating beef cooking methods based on their volatile fingerprints. A workflow for rapid assessment of the volatile profile from beef cooking methods was established, providing a baseline to further explore volatile profiles from other key ingredients.
ISSN:0951-4198
1097-0231
DOI:10.1002/rcm.9655