Value of Incremental Biopsy Cores for Microultrasound Targeted Prostate Biopsies
To determine the optimal number of cores needed during microultrasound-informed prostate biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, defined as Gleason Grade Group ≥2). A retrospective review of 1011 consecutive patients between September 2021 and July 2023 at our inst...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2024-02, Vol.184, p.142-148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To determine the optimal number of cores needed during microultrasound-informed prostate biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa, defined as Gleason Grade Group ≥2).
A retrospective review of 1011 consecutive patients between September 2021 and July 2023 at our institution were identified; 536 underwent microultrasound biopsy and 475 underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound (US) targeted biopsy. Lesions were given a Prostate Risk Identification using Microultrasound (PRI-MUS) score, with lesions PRI-MUS ≥3 targeted. MRI lesions were scored with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) and lesions PI-RADS ≥3 were targeted. The primary outcome is the detection of csPCa stratified by number of cores.
One hundred thirty-eight patients underwent targeted biopsies for microultrasound only lesions, 182 for microultrasound and MRI lesions and 426 underwent MRI/US for MRI lesions. The first targeted core detected 78.0% (46/59), 77.8% (63/81), and 78.8% (216/274) of csPCa for microultrasound, microultrasound+MRI, and MRI/US, respectively. Comparing first to third core, there was not a significant difference in overall detection of csPCa by microultrasound, though MRI/US was significantly different (28.4% vs 36.4% P = .12, 32.5% vs 41.8% P = .06, 42.5% vs 53.9% P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-4295 1527-9995 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.urology.2023.11.018 |