Impact of telephone follow-up on hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving oral chemotherapy from an ambulatory-care setting
Introduction In recent years, most molecular target drugs have been administered orally, as prescribed at ambulatory services in hospitals and at patients’ homes. Telephone follow-up is increasingly being used in clinical practice for patients needing additional support post-discharge and for the pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oncology pharmacy practice 2024-12, Vol.30 (8), p.1378-1384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
In recent years, most molecular target drugs have been administered orally, as prescribed at ambulatory services in hospitals and at patients’ homes. Telephone follow-up is increasingly being used in clinical practice for patients needing additional support post-discharge and for the prevention of hospital readmissions. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical benefits of telephone follow-up while administering oral anticancer drugs.
Methods
This was a single-center, observational, retrospective study. We evaluated hepatocellular carcinoma patients who received sorafenib or lenvatinib between March 2010 and February 2018. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events.
Results
From the total of 130 patients, 83 patients received telephone follow-up and 47 did not. The incidence of hand–foot skin reactions significantly reduced in patients with telephone follow-up (odds ratio (OR) 3.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16–11.8, p = 0.020). The median durations (ranges) of adherence to oral chemotherapy were 259 days (15−1730) for the telephone follow-up group and 121 days (14−1105) for the no-telephone follow-up group (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1078-1552 1477-092X 1477-092X |
DOI: | 10.1177/10781552231215427 |