Cardioneuroablation for reflex asystolic syncope: Mid-term safety, efficacy, and patient’s acceptance
Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a promising therapy for reflex asystolic syncope; however, convincing data on the mid-term safety and efficacy of this procedure are lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess the mid-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptance of CNA. This prospective observatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart rhythm 2024-03, Vol.21 (3), p.282-291 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a promising therapy for reflex asystolic syncope; however, convincing data on the mid-term safety and efficacy of this procedure are lacking.
The purpose of this study was to assess the mid-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptance of CNA.
This prospective observational single-center study included 115 consecutive patients (mean age 39 ± 13 years; 58% female) treated between 2016 and 2022 who completed at least 1-year follow-up.
No significant procedure-related acute complications occurred. During median follow-up of 28 months (range 12–75), 95 (83%) remained free from syncope. Of the 20 patients (17%) with syncope recurrence, syncope burden decreased from a mean 17 (median 6.5) to 3.75 (median 2.5) episodes (P = .015). In 9 of 10 patients, pacing system removal was possible. Repeated CNA was needed in 3 patients (3%), whereas pacemaker implantation was performed in 5 (4%). The most frequent mid-term complication of CNA was sinus rhythm acceleration (from 60 ± 14 bpm to 90 ± 16 bpm; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1547-5271 1556-3871 1556-3871 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.11.022 |