Cardioneuroablation for reflex asystolic syncope: Mid-term safety, efficacy, and patient’s acceptance

Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a promising therapy for reflex asystolic syncope; however, convincing data on the mid-term safety and efficacy of this procedure are lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess the mid-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptance of CNA. This prospective observatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2024-03, Vol.21 (3), p.282-291
Hauptverfasser: Kulakowski, Piotr, Baran, Jakub, Sikorska, Agnieszka, Krynski, Tomasz, Niedzwiedz, Michal, Soszynska, Malgorzata, Piotrowski, Roman
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a promising therapy for reflex asystolic syncope; however, convincing data on the mid-term safety and efficacy of this procedure are lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess the mid-term safety, efficacy, and patient acceptance of CNA. This prospective observational single-center study included 115 consecutive patients (mean age 39 ± 13 years; 58% female) treated between 2016 and 2022 who completed at least 1-year follow-up. No significant procedure-related acute complications occurred. During median follow-up of 28 months (range 12–75), 95 (83%) remained free from syncope. Of the 20 patients (17%) with syncope recurrence, syncope burden decreased from a mean 17 (median 6.5) to 3.75 (median 2.5) episodes (P = .015). In 9 of 10 patients, pacing system removal was possible. Repeated CNA was needed in 3 patients (3%), whereas pacemaker implantation was performed in 5 (4%). The most frequent mid-term complication of CNA was sinus rhythm acceleration (from 60 ± 14 bpm to 90 ± 16 bpm; P
ISSN:1547-5271
1556-3871
1556-3871
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.11.022