Budget impact of increasing uptake of denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Malaysia

Summary This study evaluated the financial impact of increasing denosumab usage for managing postmenopausal osteoporosis over a 5-year period from the Malaysian healthcare provider’s perspective. A gradual moderate increase in denosumab uptake would have a minimal budget impact, with potential savin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of osteoporosis 2023-11, Vol.18 (1), p.145-145, Article 145
Hauptverfasser: Choo, Yai Wen, Mohd Tahir, Nurul Ain, Mohamed Said, Mohd Shahrir, Makmor Bakry, Mohd, Li, Shu Chuen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary This study evaluated the financial impact of increasing denosumab usage for managing postmenopausal osteoporosis over a 5-year period from the Malaysian healthcare provider’s perspective. A gradual moderate increase in denosumab uptake would have a minimal budget impact, with potential savings in fracture treatment expenses. Optimizing denosumab usage could be a cost-effective and potentially affordable strategy to alleviate the economic burden of osteoporosis in Malaysia. Purpose The study aimed to evaluate the budget impact of increasing the uptake of denosumab for the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Malaysia. Methods A Markov budget impact model was developed to estimate the financial impact of osteoporosis treatment. We modelled a scenario in which the uptake of denosumab would increase each year compared with a static scenario. A 5-year time horizon from the perspective of a Malaysian MOH healthcare provider was used. Model inputs were based on Malaysian sources where available. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the robustness of the modelled results. Results An increase in denosumab uptake of 8% per year over a 5-year time horizon would result in an additional budget impact, from MYR 0.26 million (USD 0.06 million) in the first year to MYR 3.25 million (USD 0.78 million) in the fifth year. When expressed as cost per-member-per-month (PMPM), these were less than MYR 0.01 across all five years of treatment. In sensitivity analyses, the acquisition cost of denosumab and medication persistence had the largest impact on the budget. Conclusion From the perspective of a Malaysian MOH healthcare provider, moderately increasing uptake of denosumab would have a minimal additional budget impact, partially offset by savings in fracture treatment costs. Increasing the use of denosumab appears affordable to reduce the economic burden of osteoporosis in Malaysia.
ISSN:1862-3514
1862-3514
DOI:10.1007/s11657-023-01358-z