Comparison of voltage maps using OCTARAY catheter and PENTARAY catheter

Background Recently, a new OCTARAY® mapping catheter was commercially launched. The catheter is designed to enable high‐density mapping and precise signal recording via 48 small electrodes arranged on eight radiating splines. The purpose of this study was to compare bipolar voltage and low‐voltage‐a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pacing and clinical electrophysiology 2024-01, Vol.47 (1), p.28-35
Hauptverfasser: Masuda, Masaharu, Matsuda, Yasuhiro, Uematsu, Hiroyuki, Asai, Mitsutoshi, Okamoto, Shin, Ishihara, Takayuki, Nanto, Kiyonori, Tsujimura, Takuya, Hata, Yosuke, Higashino, Naoko, Nakao, Sho, Mano, Toshiaki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Recently, a new OCTARAY® mapping catheter was commercially launched. The catheter is designed to enable high‐density mapping and precise signal recording via 48 small electrodes arranged on eight radiating splines. The purpose of this study was to compare bipolar voltage and low‐voltage‐area size, and mapping efficacy between the OCTARAY catheter and the PENTARAY® catheter Methods Twelve consecutive patients who underwent initial and second ablations for persistent atrial fibrillation within 2 years were considered for enrollment. Voltage mapping was performed twice, first during the initial ablation using the PENTARY catheter and second during the second ablation using the OCTARAY Long 3‐3‐3‐3‐3 (L3) catheter. Results Mean voltage with the OCTARAY‐L3 catheter (1.64 ± 0.57 mV) was 32.3% greater than that with the PENTARAY catheter (1.24 ± 0.46 mV, p 
ISSN:0147-8389
1540-8159
DOI:10.1111/pace.14890