A Randomized Wait-List Controlled Trial of Men in Mind: Enhancing Mental Health Practitioners' Self-Rated Clinical Competencies to Work With Men
Improved engagement of men in psychotherapy is an essential element in improving male health outcomes. This trial examined whether the Men in Mind intervention improved practitioners' self-rated clinical competencies to engage and respond to male clients in therapy. A parallel, single-blind, wa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American psychologist 2024-04, Vol.79 (3), p.423-436 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Improved engagement of men in psychotherapy is an essential element in improving male health outcomes. This trial examined whether the Men in Mind intervention improved practitioners' self-rated clinical competencies to engage and respond to male clients in therapy. A parallel, single-blind, wait-list randomized controlled trial was conducted with Australian-based mental health practitioners, currently administering psychotherapy to males, fluent in English, and not currently completing their undergraduate degree. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1, through variable-sized blocks stratified by gender, to either the intervention (Men in Mind) or wait-list control. Men in Mind was offered as a self-led 6-week, five-module online program to upskill practitioners to engage and respond to male clients. The primary outcome was self-reported competency in engaging men in psychotherapy, measured by the Engaging Men in Therapy Scale (EMITS) at 6 weeks. All analyses were by intention-to-treat. Between January 16 and March 17, 2022, 587 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 300) or wait-list control (n = 287). In total, 492 (84%) participants completed the primary endpoint assessment at 6 weeks. Men in Mind demonstrated a large effect of improved EMITS scores compared to the control group (d = 2.63, 95% CI [2.39, 2.87], p < .001). Men in Mind was effective at increasing mental health practitioners' self-reported efficacy to work with men, which is potentially a key change mechanism in their ability to improve health outcomes for male clients. A limitation of the trial was the use of a bespoke, self-reported primary outcome, while a strength was the gender-responsive intervention design.
Public Significance Statement
Mental health practitioners experience challenges engaging and responding to help-seeking men, particularly suicidal men. Men report they often experience psychotherapy services as not "male-friendly." To address this, the Men in Mind program was developed. This trial evaluated the efficacy of the Men in Mind training, which was specifically designed to upskill mental health practitioners so that they are able to provide a service that is aligned with men's needs and "meets them where they are at." Men in Mind significantly improved practitioners' confidence and self-efficacy related to engaging and responding to help-seeking men. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
DOI: | 10.1037/amp0001242 |