Moderate‐intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy versus high‐intensity statin monotherapy in patients with metabolic syndrome and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: A post‐hoc analysis of the RACING trial

Aim This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a moderate‐intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy versus high‐intensity statin monotherapy in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Materials and Methods In this post‐hoc subgroup analysis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes, obesity & metabolism obesity & metabolism, 2024-03, Vol.26 (3), p.829-839
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Yong‐Joon, Lee, Sang‐Hyup, You, Seng Chan, Lee, Yong‐ho, Lee, Seung‐Jun, Hong, Sung‐Jin, Ahn, Chul‐Min, Kim, Byeong‐Keuk, Ko, Young‐Guk, Choi, Donghoon, Hong, Myeong‐Ki, Jang, Yangsoo, Kim, Jung‐Sun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aim This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a moderate‐intensity statin with ezetimibe combination therapy versus high‐intensity statin monotherapy in patients with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Materials and Methods In this post‐hoc subgroup analysis of the RACING trial, patients were analysed based on the presence of MetS. MetS was defined as meeting at least three of the five following criteria: (a) elevated waist circumference; (b) elevated triglycerides; (c) reduced high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; (d) elevated blood pressure; and (e) elevated fasting glucose. The primary outcome was a 3‐year composite of cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular events, or non‐fatal stroke. Results Of the 3780 patients enrolled in the RACING trial, 1703 (45.1%) had MetS at baseline. The primary outcome rate was 10.1% and 10.3% in patients with MetS receiving ezetimibe combination therapy versus high‐intensity statin monotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.97; 95% confidence interval = 0.72‐1.32; p = .868). Lower rates of intolerance‐related drug discontinuation or dose reduction (3.9% vs. 8.0%; p 
ISSN:1462-8902
1463-1326
DOI:10.1111/dom.15374