Functional lumen imaging probe topography identifies patients with normal acid exposure and esophageal hypervigilance amongst proton-pump inhibitor non-responders

Background Multiple factors contribute to symptom generation and treatment response in proton-pump inhibitor non-responders (PPI-NRs). We aimed to test whether PPI-NRs with normal acid exposure have a higher degree of esophageal hypersensitivity and hypervigilance and can be identified using functio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2024, Vol.38 (1), p.291-299
Hauptverfasser: Biermann, Maya, Hersh, Marc, Kline, Meredith, Fowler, Halley, Calderon, Lucie, Godiers, Marie, Kundu, Suprateek, Jain, Anand S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Multiple factors contribute to symptom generation and treatment response in proton-pump inhibitor non-responders (PPI-NRs). We aimed to test whether PPI-NRs with normal acid exposure have a higher degree of esophageal hypersensitivity and hypervigilance and can be identified using functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) topography at the time of endoscopy. Methods Data from PPI-NRs whom underwent endoscopy, FLIP and wireless 96-h pH-metry were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped according to acid exposure time (AET) as (a) 0 days abnormal (AET > 6%), (b) 1–2 days abnormal, or (c) 3–4 days abnormal. The esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS) score and other symptom scores were compared between groups. The discriminatory ability of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) distensibility index (DI) and max EGJ diameter in identifying patients with 0 days abnormal AET was tested via receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results EHAS score was 38.6 in the 0 days abnormal AET group, 30.4 in the 1–2 days abnormal AET group ( p  = 0.073 when compared to 0 days abnormal) and 28.2 in the 3–4 days abnormal AET group ( p  = 0.031 when compared to 0 days abnormal). Area-under-the-curve (AUC) for the DI in association with 0 days AET > 6% was 0.629. A DI of 
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-023-10556-2