Improvement of image quality in diffusion-weighted imaging with model-based deep learning reconstruction for evaluations of the head and neck

Objectives To investigate the utility of deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction using a model-based approach in head and neck diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 41 patients who underwent head/neck DWI. The DWI in 25 patients demons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magma (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2024-07, Vol.37 (3), p.439-447
Hauptverfasser: Fujima, Noriyuki, Nakagawa, Junichi, Kameda, Hiroyuki, Ikebe, Yohei, Harada, Taisuke, Shimizu, Yukie, Tsushima, Nayuta, Kano, Satoshi, Homma, Akihiro, Kwon, Jihun, Yoneyama, Masami, Kudo, Kohsuke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives To investigate the utility of deep learning (DL)-based image reconstruction using a model-based approach in head and neck diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 41 patients who underwent head/neck DWI. The DWI in 25 patients demonstrated an untreated lesion. We performed qualitative and quantitative assessments in the DWI analyses with both deep learning (DL)- and conventional parallel imaging (PI)-based reconstructions. For the qualitative assessment, we visually evaluated the overall image quality, soft tissue conspicuity, degree of artifact(s), and lesion conspicuity based on a five-point system. In the quantitative assessment, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the bilateral parotid glands, submandibular gland, the posterior muscle, and the lesion. We then calculated the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the lesion and the adjacent muscle. Results Significant differences were observed in the qualitative analysis between the DWI with PI-based and DL-based reconstructions for all of the evaluation items ( p  
ISSN:1352-8661
1352-8661
DOI:10.1007/s10334-023-01129-4