Functional outcome after selective dorsal rhizotomy: a retrospective case control study

Purpose This study examines long-term benefit on functional outcomes and quality of life after selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) in children with spastic diplegia in Hong Kong. Method This is a case control study. Individuals with spastic diplegia who were at 6 to 12 years post-SDR were recruited. Ag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Child's nervous system 2024-03, Vol.40 (3), p.873-880
Hauptverfasser: Chow, C. P., Wong, L. Y., Poon, C. Y. C., Yiu, B. P. H., Wong, T. P. S., Wong, M., Yam, K. Y., Ngai, S. P. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose This study examines long-term benefit on functional outcomes and quality of life after selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) in children with spastic diplegia in Hong Kong. Method This is a case control study. Individuals with spastic diplegia who were at 6 to 12 years post-SDR were recruited. Age, gender, cognition, and Gross Motor Function Classification System level-matched individuals with spastic diplegia who had not undergone SDR were recruited as controls. Outcome measures included physical level, functional level, physiological level, and quality of life. All data were compared by independent t -test. Results Individuals post-SDR ( n  = 15) demonstrated a significantly better range of ankle dorsiflexion in knee extension by − 5.7 ± 10.9° than the control group ( n  = 12). No other significant differences were observed. Conclusion SDR is a safe, one-off procedure and provides long-term reduction in spasticity with no major complications. With the heterogeneity, we did not demonstrate between-group differences in long-term functional outcomes.
ISSN:0256-7040
1433-0350
DOI:10.1007/s00381-023-06213-7