Impact of a Pharmacist-Managed Telemedicine Pharmacotherapy Clinic in the Era of COVID-19

Purpose: Telemedicine has been essential during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In March 2020, pharmacist-led chronic disease state management services at our family care centers and primary care clinics were converted to telemedicine. This study aimed to determine the impact of ex...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmacy practice 2024-10, Vol.37 (5), p.1066-1072
Hauptverfasser: Marte, Francheska, Bianco, Jessica, Martinez, Amanda, Carris, Nicholas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose: Telemedicine has been essential during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In March 2020, pharmacist-led chronic disease state management services at our family care centers and primary care clinics were converted to telemedicine. This study aimed to determine the impact of expanding telemedicine services on appointment adherence, clinical outcomes, and financial reimbursement. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, quasi-experimental study of the impact of expanding telemedicine services on adult patients with diabetes, hypertension, and/or hyperlipidemia. The study included patients scheduled with a pharmacist at a hospital-based (HB) or physician-based (PB) clinic. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean no-show rate. The secondary outcomes were differences in mean change in HbA1c, LDL, blood pressure, and reimbursement. Mean differences between pre- and post-telemedicine groups of each clinic were measured for all outcomes. Results: The mean difference (SE) in the no-show rate in the HB clinic was -12.09% (4.862; P = .014), compared to 2.88% (3.656; P = .431) in the PB clinic. The mean difference (SE) in the change in HbA1c in the HB clinic was .00% (.338; P = .992), compared to .01% (.239; P = .945) in the PB clinic. The mean difference (SE) in reimbursement in the HB clinic was $1.93 (4.209; P = .647), compared to $20.46 (3.210; P < .0001) in the PB clinic. Conclusion: Expansion of pharmacy telemedicine services provided evidence for improved appointment adherence in the HB clinic and increased reimbursement in the PB clinic. No change in healthcare outcomes was observed.
ISSN:0897-1900
1531-1937
1531-1937
DOI:10.1177/08971900231210156