An umbrella review of the benefits and risks associated with youths’ interactions with electronic screens

The influence of electronic screens on the health of children and adolescents and their education is not well understood. In this prospectively registered umbrella review (PROSPERO identifier CRD42017076051 ), we harmonized effects from 102 meta-analyses (2,451 primary studies; 1,937,501 participant...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature human behaviour 2024-01, Vol.8 (1), p.82-99
Hauptverfasser: Sanders, Taren, Noetel, Michael, Parker, Philip, Del Pozo Cruz, Borja, Biddle, Stuart, Ronto, Rimante, Hulteen, Ryan, Parker, Rhiannon, Thomas, George, De Cocker, Katrien, Salmon, Jo, Hesketh, Kylie, Weeks, Nicole, Arnott, Hugh, Devine, Emma, Vasconcellos, Roberta, Pagano, Rebecca, Sherson, Jamie, Conigrave, James, Lonsdale, Chris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The influence of electronic screens on the health of children and adolescents and their education is not well understood. In this prospectively registered umbrella review (PROSPERO identifier CRD42017076051 ), we harmonized effects from 102 meta-analyses (2,451 primary studies; 1,937,501 participants) of screen time and outcomes. In total, 43 effects from 32 meta-analyses met our criteria for statistical certainty. Meta-analyses of associations between screen use and outcomes showed small-to-moderate effects (range: r  = –0.14 to 0.33). In education, results were mixed; for example, screen use was negatively associated with literacy ( r  = –0.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) = –0.20 to –0.09, P  ≤ 0.001, k  = 38, N  = 18,318), but this effect was positive when parents watched with their children ( r  = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.28, P  = 0.028, k  = 12, N  = 6,083). In health, we found evidence for several small negative associations; for example, social media was associated with depression ( r  = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.05 to 0.19, P  ≤ 0.001, k  = 12, N  = 93,740). Limitations of our review include the limited number of studies for each outcome, medium-to-high risk of bias in 95 out of 102 included meta-analyses and high heterogeneity (17 out of 22 in education and 20 out of 21 in health with I 2  > 50%). We recommend that caregivers and policymakers carefully weigh the evidence for potential harms and benefits of specific types of screen use. Findings from an umbrella review of more than 100 meta-analyses suggest that screen time can have both positive and negative associations with educational and health outcomes for youth, but effect sizes are small.
ISSN:2397-3374
2397-3374
DOI:10.1038/s41562-023-01712-8