Reduced count pediatric whole-body 18F-FDG PET imaging reconstruction with a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm
Background Advanced positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction methods promise to allow optimized PET/CT protocols with improved image quality, decreased administered activity and/or acquisition times. Objective To evaluate the impact of reducing counts (simulating reduced acquisition t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric radiology 2024-01, Vol.54 (1), p.170-180 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Advanced positron emission tomography (PET) image reconstruction methods promise to allow optimized PET/CT protocols with improved image quality, decreased administered activity and/or acquisition times.
Objective
To evaluate the impact of reducing counts (simulating reduced acquisition time) in block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) reconstructed pediatric whole-body
18
F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET images, and to compare BSERM with ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) reconstructed reduced-count images.
Materials and methods
Twenty children (16 male) underwent clinical whole-body
18
F-FDG PET/CT examinations using a 25-cm axial field-of-view (FOV) digital PET/CT system at 90 s per bed (s/bed) with BSREM reconstruction (
β
=700). Reduced count simulations with varied BSREM β levels were generated from list-mode data: 60 s/bed,
β
=800; 50 s/bed,
β
=900; 40 s/bed,
β
=1000; and 30 s/bed,
β
=1300. In addition, a single OSEM reconstruction was created at 60 s/bed based on prior literature. Qualitative (Likert scores) and quantitative (standardized uptake value [SUV]) analyses were performed to evaluate image quality and quantitation across simulated reconstructions.
Results
The mean patient age was 9.0 ± 5.5 (SD) years, mean weight was 38.5 ± 24.5 kg, and mean administered
18
F-FDG activity was 4.5 ± 0.7 (SD) MBq/kg. Between BSREM reconstructions, no qualitative measure showed a significant difference versus the 90 s/bed
β
=700 standard (all
P
>0.05). SUV
max
values for lesions were significantly lower from 90 s/bed,
β
=700 only at a simulated acquisition time of 30 s/bed,
β
=1300 (
P
=0.001). In a side-by-side comparison of BSREM versus OSEM reconstructions, 40 s/bed,
β
=1000 images were generally preferred over 60 s/bed TOF OSEM images.
Conclusion
In children who undergo whole-body
18
F-FDG PET/CT on a 25-cm FOV digital PET/CT scanner, reductions in acquisition time or, by corollary, administered radiopharmaceutical activity of >50% from a clinical standard of 90 s/bed may be possible while maintaining diagnostic quality when a BSREM reconstruction algorithm is used.
Graphical Abstract |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1432-1998 0301-0449 1432-1998 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00247-023-05801-8 |