Wellness Among Interventional Radiologists: Results From a Multidimensional Survey

To evaluate wellness among interventional radiologists using a multidimensional survey. An anonymous 53-item survey, including 36 Perceived Wellness Survey (PWS) prompts, was created in Qualtrics (an online survey tool) to assess wellness among interventional radiology attendings and residents. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic radiology 2024-03, Vol.31 (3), p.1130-1140
Hauptverfasser: Roth, Matthew F., Chick, Jeffrey Forris Beecham, McLoughlin, Dane, Shin, David S., Chadalavada, Seetharam C., Monroe, Eric J., Hage, Anthony N., Ji, Ido, Lee, Eunjee, Makary, Mina S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate wellness among interventional radiologists using a multidimensional survey. An anonymous 53-item survey, including 36 Perceived Wellness Survey (PWS) prompts, was created in Qualtrics (an online survey tool) to assess wellness among interventional radiology attendings and residents. The survey was open from June to September, 2022, 2 years into the COVID-19 Pandemic. The survey was distributed via Society of Interventional Radiology Forums, social media (Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook), and personal correspondence. PWS scores were categorized into Wellness Composite and subscores (physical, emotional, intellectual, psychological, social, and spiritual). 367 surveys were completed. 300 (81.7%) respondents were male and 67 (18.3%) were female. Respondents included attending physicians (297; 81.0%) and residents (70; 19.0%). Practice settings included academic (174; 47.4%), private (114; 31.0%), private-academic hybrid (62; 16.9%), and others (17; 4.7%). Mean Wellness Composite at academic centers (14.74 ± 3.16; range: 5.42–23.50) was significantly lower than at private (15.22 ± 3.37; range: 6.13–23.51) and hybrid (16.14 ± 2.47; range: 10.20–23.50) practices (p = 0.01). Respondents
ISSN:1076-6332
1878-4046
DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2023.09.018