Up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket treatment of swine wastewater: Effect of heterologous and homologous inocula on anaerobic digestion performance and the microbial community

[Display omitted] •At high OLR, COD removal efficiency of ASDS-UASB and ASSW-UASB were highest.•Average methane yield of ASSW-UASB is 15.3% higher than that of ASDS-UASB.•Excess sludge produced by ASSW-UASB of was 73.0% lower than that of ASDS-UASB.•ASDS-UASB reduced pathogenic bacteria by 88%, whil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bioresource technology 2023-10, Vol.386, p.129463-129463, Article 129463
Hauptverfasser: Luo, Can, He, Tenbing, Wang, Guoying, Tian, Maoyuan, Dai, Liangyu, Pu, Tianyun, Tian, Guangliang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] •At high OLR, COD removal efficiency of ASDS-UASB and ASSW-UASB were highest.•Average methane yield of ASSW-UASB is 15.3% higher than that of ASDS-UASB.•Excess sludge produced by ASSW-UASB of was 73.0% lower than that of ASDS-UASB.•ASDS-UASB reduced pathogenic bacteria by 88%, while ASSW-UASB maintained a low level. The effects of heterogenous (anaerobic sludge from treating distillery sewage, ASDS) and homologous (anaerobic sludge from treating swine wastewater, ASSW) inocula on anaerobic digestion and the microbial community in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket treating swine wastewater were compared. The highest chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies with ASDS (84.8%) and ASSW (83.1%) were obtained with an organic loading rate of 15 kg COD/m3/d. For ASSW compared with ASDS, methane production efficiency was 15.3% higher and excess sludge production was 73.0% lower. The abundance of the cellulose hydrolyzing bacterium Clostridium sensu stricto_1 with ASDS (36.1%) was 1.5 times that with ASSW, while that of Methanosarcina with ASSW (22.9%) was > 100 times that with ASDS. ASDS reduced the content of pathogenic bacteria by 88.0%, while ASSW maintained a low level of pathogenic bacteria. ASSW greatly improved the methane production efficiency of wastewater and is more suitable for treating swine wastewater.
ISSN:0960-8524
1873-2976
DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129463