Availability and Readability Level of Online Patient Education Materials Provided by Cleft Lip and Palate Teams
OBJECTIVESEvaluate the readability of online English and Spanish cleft lip and palate patient education materials.DESIGNReview of free online materials.SETTINGEnglish and Spanish language online patient education materials on cleft lip and palate were collected from American Cleft Palate-Craniofacia...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal 2023-11, p.10556656231213170-10556656231213170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | OBJECTIVESEvaluate the readability of online English and Spanish cleft lip and palate patient education materials.DESIGNReview of free online materials.SETTINGEnglish and Spanish language online patient education materials on cleft lip and palate were collected from American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved teams.PARTICIPANTSAmerican Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association (ACPA) approved teams.INTERVENTIONSEnglish materials were analyzed using the Flesch-Kincaid, SMOG, and Coleman-Liau readability calculators. Spanish materials were analyzed using the Fry Graph, Fernandez Huerta, and INFLESZ calculators. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for variability between the readability tools.OUTCOMESReadability levels were examined for both sets of materials.RESULTS171 (90.5%) teams provided English language materials online, with an average readability score calculated as 10.5 ± 2.9 (10th-11th grade). A total of 44 (23.2%) teams listed Spanish language materials online, with average readability score of 7.9 ± 1.2 (8th grade). ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant variability between the readability assessment tools (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1055-6656 1545-1569 |
DOI: | 10.1177/10556656231213170 |