Brachial plexus block using only 1% lidocaine to reduce pain during the endovascular treatment of dysfunctional arteriovenous access

BACKGROUNDInterventional endovascular treatments of dysfunctional arteriovenous (AV) access for hemodialysis can cause pain and discomfort to the patients. Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (BPB) is an alternative regional anesthesia method, but conventional BPB using ropivacaine or bupivacain...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of vascular access 2023-10, p.11297298231190418-11297298231190418
Hauptverfasser: Park, Sung-Joon, Chung, Hwan Hoon, Lee, Yun Hak, Lee, Hyoung Nam, Cho, Youngjong, Lee, Sangjoon, Lee, Seung Hwa, Yang, Woo Young
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUNDInterventional endovascular treatments of dysfunctional arteriovenous (AV) access for hemodialysis can cause pain and discomfort to the patients. Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (BPB) is an alternative regional anesthesia method, but conventional BPB using ropivacaine or bupivacaine may cause long-lasting motor power loss, significantly reducing patient satisfaction. This study aimed to introduce BPB using only 1% lidocaine, which induces sensory loss while minimizing motor block, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of this procedure.METHODSThis retrospective study was conducted on 277 consecutive patients with dysfunctional AV access requiring percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Of these, 174 patients underwent the BPB procedure using 1% lidocaine. Time data were recorded, and the motor strength grade (MRC scale, grade 0-5) was evaluated. Numeric rating pain score (NRPS, grade 0-10) was asked during every PTA, and overall NRPS and satisfaction scores (scale 1-3) were asked after the procedure was completed.RESULTSOf the 174 patients who received BPB, the success rate was 100%, and there were no significant complications related to BPB. The MRC scale measured at the time when the complete sensory loss was achieved was 1.99 ± 0.63, and that at the point of sensory recovery when the block effect expired was 3.93 ± 0.62, indicating a good grade of motor strength. The average NRPS during PTA in the BPB group was significantly lower than that of the control group without BPB (1.04 ± 2.04vs 6.30 ± 2.71, p 
ISSN:1129-7298
1724-6032
DOI:10.1177/11297298231190418