Macrostructural Cerebellar Neuroplasticity Correlates With Motor Recovery After Stroke

Background Motor recovery varies across post-stroke individuals, some of whom require a better rehabilitation strategy. We hypothesized that macrostructural neuroplasticity of the motor control network including the cerebellum might underlie individual differences in motor recovery. Objectives. To g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurorehabilitation and neural repair 2023-12, Vol.37 (11-12), p.775-785
Hauptverfasser: Hanakawa, Takashi, Hotta, Fujiko, Nakamura, Tatsuhiro, Shindo, Keiichiro, Ushiba, Naoko, Hirosawa, Masaki, Yamazaki, Yutaka, Moriyama, Yoshinao, Takagi, Syota, Mizuno, Katsuhiro, Liu, Meigen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Motor recovery varies across post-stroke individuals, some of whom require a better rehabilitation strategy. We hypothesized that macrostructural neuroplasticity of the motor control network including the cerebellum might underlie individual differences in motor recovery. Objectives. To gain insight into the macrostructural neuroplasticity after stroke, we examined 52 post-stroke individuals using both the Fugl-Meyer assessment and structural magnetic resonance imaging. Methods We performed voxel-based lesion symptom mapping and cross-sectional voxel-based morphometry to correlate the motor scores with the lesion location and the gray matter volume (GMV), respectively. Longitudinal data were available at ~8 and/or 15 weeks after admission from 43 individuals with supratentorial lesions. We performed a longitudinal VBM analysis followed by a multiple regression analysis to correlate between the changes of the motor assessment scores and those of GMV overtime. Results We found a cross-sectional correlation of residual motor functioning with GMV in the ipsilesional cerebellum and contralesional parietal cortex. Longitudinally, we found increases in GMV in the ipsilesional supplementary motor area, and the ipsilesional superior and inferior cerebellar zones, along with a GMV decrease in the ipsilesional thalamus. The motor recovery was correlated with the GMV changes in the superior and inferior cerebellar zones. The regaining of upper-limb motor functioning was correlated with the GMV changes of both superior and inferior cerebellum while that of lower-limb motor functioning with the GMV increase of the inferior cerebellum only. Conclusions The present findings support the hypothesis that macrostructural cerebellar neuroplasticity is correlated with individual differences in motor recovery after stroke.
ISSN:1545-9683
1552-6844
DOI:10.1177/15459683231207356