Prevalence of Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma With and Without Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are an essential criterion for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) screening in most gastroenterology society guidelines, a significant proportion of BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases do not endorse them. In a systematic review and meta-analys...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology 2024-07, Vol.22 (7), p.1381-1394.e7
Hauptverfasser: Saha, Bibek, Vantanasiri, Kornpong, Mohan, Babu P., Goyal, Rohit, Garg, Nikita, Gerberi, Danielle, Kisiel, John B., Singh, Siddharth, Iyer, Prasad G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are an essential criterion for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) screening in most gastroenterology society guidelines, a significant proportion of BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases do not endorse them. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to study the prevalence of BE/EAC in those with and without GERD. A systematic search was conducted through 5 major databases for studies reporting prevalence of BE/EAC in patients with and without GERD. Pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) of BE, long-segment BE, short-segment BE, dysplasia, and EAC in patients with and without GERD were synthesized. Forty-three articles (12,883 patients with GERD; 51,350 patients without GERD) were included in the final analysis. BE prevalence was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8%–8.5%) and 2.2% (95% CI, 1.6%–3%) among individuals with and without GERD, respectively. EAC prevalence was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%–1%) and 0.1% (95% CI, 0%–0.2%) in those with and without GERD, respectively. The overall risks for BE (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.06–4.11) and long-segment BE (OR,4.17; 95% CI, 1.78–9.77) were higher in patients with GERD, but the risk for short-segment BE (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.89–3.52) did not differ between the two groups. In 9 population-based high-quality studies (2244 patients with GERD; 3724 patients without GERD), BE prevalence in patients without GERD was 4.9% (95% CI, 2.6%–9%). BE prevalence was highest in North American studies (10.6% [GERD] and 4.8% [non-GERD]). BE prevalence in those without GERD is substantial, particularly in large high-quality population-based studies. These data are important to factor in future BE/EAC early detection guidelines. [Display omitted]
ISSN:1542-3565
1542-7714
1542-7714
DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.006