Incidence of Severe Adverse Drug Reactions to Ultrasound Enhancement Agents in a Contemporary Echocardiography Practice

Prior data indicate a very rare risk of serious adverse drug reaction (ADR) to ultrasound enhancement agents (UEAs). We sought to evaluate the frequency of ADR to UEA administration in contemporary practice. We retrospectively reviewed 4 US health systems to characterize the frequency and severity o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2024-03, Vol.37 (3), p.276-284.e3
Hauptverfasser: Ali, Mays T., Johnson, Mark, Irwin, Timothy, Henry, Sonia, Sugeng, Lissa, Kansal, Sarita, Allison, Thomas G., Bremer, Merri L., Jones, Victoria R., Martineau, Michael D., Wong, Connie, Marecki, Gregory, Stebbins, Julie, Michelena, Hector I., McCully, Robert B., Svatikova, Anna, Padang, Ratnasari, Scott, Christopher G., Kanuga, Mansi J., Arsanjani, Reza, Pellikka, Patricia A., Kane, Garvan C., Thaden, Jeremy J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Prior data indicate a very rare risk of serious adverse drug reaction (ADR) to ultrasound enhancement agents (UEAs). We sought to evaluate the frequency of ADR to UEA administration in contemporary practice. We retrospectively reviewed 4 US health systems to characterize the frequency and severity of ADR to UEA. Adverse drug reactions were considered severe when cardiopulmonary involvement was present and critical when there was loss of consciousness, loss of pulse, or ST-segment elevation. Rates of isolated back pain and headache were derived from the Mayo Clinic Rochester stress echocardiography database where systematic prospective reporting of ADR was performed. Among 26,539 Definity and 11,579 Lumason administrations in the Mayo Clinic Rochester stress echocardiography database, isolated back pain or headache was more frequent with Definity (0.49% vs 0.04%, P 
ISSN:0894-7317
1097-6795
DOI:10.1016/j.echo.2023.10.010