Greenhouse gas emissions from bio-based growing media: A life-cycle assessment

In this study, using an LCA approach we explored how bio-based peat alternatives (wood fiber, compost, and hydrochar based on willow and degassed fiber from agricultural waste) and their mixtures (75 % peat with 25 % peat alternative) as growing media (GM) for plant production in Denmark may provide benefits for reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to peat. To perform this, foreground data (collected from via personal communication and literature) was used together with background data from Ecoinvent V3.8. The chosen functional unit was 1 m3 of GM and the system boundary was from cradle to use as GM. The global warming potential of all the peat alternatives showed significant reduction, varying between 89 and 109 % compared to peat. When incorporating 25 % of each alternative with peat, the climate footprint was reduced by 16 to 33 % compared to pure peat. Thus, there are large climate prospects in replacing peat with bio-based alternatives, and the results underlines the relevance of being able to increase the proportion of the bio-based components in their mixtures with peat beyond the 25 % and towards 100 % replacement. The effectiveness of peat substitutes in term of reducing the CO2 emissions is affected by choice of the feedstock, their processing method and emissions of their end-use. [Display omitted] •Reducing global warming potential of growing media exploit local bio-based peat alternatives and their mixtures with peat.•Global warming potential of all the peat alternatives showed significant CO2 reduction compared to peat.•Effectiveness of peat alternatives is affected by choice of the feedstock, their processing method and emissions of their end-use.•A proper selection of peat alternatives and their mixtures plays an important role for CO2 reduction while minimizing loss of plant production through reduction in peat amount.•There are large climate prospects in replacing peat with bio-based alternatives.