Clinical Accuracy of Alinity m HR HPV Assay on Self- versus Clinician-Taken Samples Using the VALHUDES Protocol

The VALHUDES was established to evaluate clinical accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) assays to detect cervical precancer on first-void urine (FVU) and vaginal self-samples versus matched clinician-collected cervical samples (CCSs). In this study, we evaluated clinical performance of Alinity m HR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD 2023-12, Vol.25 (12), p.957-966
Hauptverfasser: Latsuzbaia, Ardashel, Van Keer, Severien, Broeck, Davy Vanden, Weyers, Steven, Donders, Gilbert, De Sutter, Philippe, Tjalma, Wiebren, Doyen, Jean, Vorsters, Alex, Arbyn, Marc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The VALHUDES was established to evaluate clinical accuracy of human papillomavirus (HPV) assays to detect cervical precancer on first-void urine (FVU) and vaginal self-samples versus matched clinician-collected cervical samples (CCSs). In this study, we evaluated clinical performance of Alinity m HR HPV assay in a colposcopy referral population. Home-collected FVU (Colli-Pee FV 5020) 1 day before colposcopy (n = 492), at-clinic collected dry vaginal self-samples [multi-Collect Swab (mC; n = 493), followed by Evalyn Brush (EB; n = 233) or Qvintip (QT; n = 260)] and matched CCSs, were available for the study. At the laboratory, mC swabs were resuspended in 2.5 mL Cervi-Collect buffer, and EB and QT were transferred in 20 mL PreservCyt. Sensitivity to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher of Alinity testing on FVU (ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85–1.03), mC (ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94–1.06), and EB/QT (ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85–1.00) was not different to CCSs. Specificity on FVU was similar to CCS (ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.95–1.10), whereas specificity on mC was lower (ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76–0.90), but on EB/QT was higher (ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01–1.15) than on CCS. Accuracy on EB (sensitivity ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.87–1.05; specificity ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06–1.31) was slightly better than on QT (sensitivity ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75–1.03; specificity ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.92–1.09). In conclusion, clinical sensitivity of Alinity assay on all self-sample types was similar to cervical specimens in a colposcopy referral population. Adjustment of signal thresholds improved assay's accuracy to detect cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or higher in all self-sample types.
ISSN:1525-1578
1943-7811
DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2023.09.008