What can we gain from subpopulation universal pulses? A simulation‐based study

Purpose The aim of the study was to explore a novel methodology for designing universal pulses (UPs) that balances the benefits of a calibration‐free approach with subject‐specific online pulse design. Methods The proposed method involves segmenting the population into subpopulations with variabilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance in medicine 2024-02, Vol.91 (2), p.570-582
Hauptverfasser: Tyshchenko, Igor, Lévy, Simon, Jin, Jin, Tahayori, Bahman, Blunck, Yasmin, Johnston, Leigh A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The aim of the study was to explore a novel methodology for designing universal pulses (UPs) that balances the benefits of a calibration‐free approach with subject‐specific online pulse design. Methods The proposed method involves segmenting the population into subpopulations with variability in anatomical shapes and positions reduced to 75%, 50%, and 25% of their original values while keeping the mean values unchanged. An additional 25% extreme case with a large volume of interest and shifted position was included. For each group, a 5kT‐points universal inversion pulse was designed and assessed by the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) on the target longitudinal magnetization profile. The performance was compared to the conventional one‐size‐fits‐all approach. A total of 132 electromagnetic simulations were executed to generate representative anatomies and specific absorption rate (SAR) distributions in a three‐dimensional parameter space comprised of head breadth, head length, and Y‐shift. The 99.9th percentile on the peak local SAR distribution was utilized to establish an intersubject variability safety margin. Results UPs designed for subpopulations with decreased head shape and position variability reduced the anatomical safety margin by up to 20%. Furthermore, when a head was significantly different to the average case, the proposed approach improved the inversion homogeneity by up to 24%, compared to the conventional one‐size‐fits‐all approach. Conclusion Subpopulation UPs present an opportunity to improve the B1+$$ {\mathrm{B}}_1^{+} $$ homogeneity and reduce anatomical SAR safety margins at 7T without additional acquisition time for calibration.
ISSN:0740-3194
1522-2594
DOI:10.1002/mrm.29884