Improved outcomes of large B‐cell lymphoma patients treated with CD19 CAR T in the UK over time

Summary The success of CD19 Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy in large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL) has been partially offset by toxicity and logistical challenges, which off‐the‐shelf agents like CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies might potentially overcome. However, when using CAR T outcomes as...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British journal of haematology 2024-02, Vol.204 (2), p.507-513
Hauptverfasser: Boyle, S., Roddie, C., O'Reilly, M., Menne, T., Norman, J., Gibb, A., Lugthart, S., Chaganti, S., Gonzalez Arias, C., Jones, C., Latif, A., Uttenthal, B. J., Seymour, F., Osborne, W., Springell, D., Hardefeldt, P., Yallop, D., Thoulouli, E., Bloor, A., Besley, C., Mathew, A., Burns, D., Cwynarski, K., Sanderson, R., Kuhnl, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary The success of CD19 Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T‐cell therapy in large B‐cell lymphoma (LBCL) has been partially offset by toxicity and logistical challenges, which off‐the‐shelf agents like CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies might potentially overcome. However, when using CAR T outcomes as the ʽstandard‐of‐care comparator̕ for relapsed/refractory (r/r) LBCL, a potential learning curve with implementing a novel, complex therapy like CAR T needs to be considered. To address this, we analysed 726 UK patients intended to be treated with CD19 CAR T for r/r LBCL and compared outcomes between the first year of the national CAR T programme (Era 1; 2019) and the more recent treatment era (Era 2; 2020–2022). We identified significant improvements for Era 2 versus Era 1 in dropout rate (17% vs. 27%, p = 0.001), progression‐free survival (1‐year PFS 50% vs. 32%, p 
ISSN:0007-1048
1365-2141
DOI:10.1111/bjh.19157