Barriers and facilitators to implementation of outcome measures among physiotherapists in Nepal: A mixed-methods study

Standardised outcome measures are essential to evidence-based practice but their implementation remains a significant challenge in low- and middle-income countries. Barriers and enablers for implementation of outcome measures are likely to be different depending on the context in which they are to b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Musculoskeletal science & practice 2023-11, Vol.68, p.102859-102859, Article 102859
Hauptverfasser: Pathak, Anupa, Sharma, Saurab, Bajracharya, Nibha, Gurung, Gagan, Nepal, Govinda Mani, Abbott, J Haxby
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Standardised outcome measures are essential to evidence-based practice but their implementation remains a significant challenge in low- and middle-income countries. Barriers and enablers for implementation of outcome measures are likely to be different depending on the context in which they are to be used. We sought to understand barriers and facilitators to use of standardised outcome measures (e.g. patient-reported, performance-based, clinician-reported) during clinical assessment among physiotherapists in Nepal. Exploratory sequential mixed-method study. We conducted focus groups with physiotherapists in Nepal to understand factors contributing to standardised outcome measure use/non-use in depth and thematically analysed the data using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). To triangulate the findings, we used an online survey which was distributed to practicing physiotherapists in Nepal using social media. We interviewed 26 physiotherapists for the qualitative phase and 125 physiotherapists responded to our online survey. The most endorsed facilitator was mandating their use through regulations at organisational or national level, for example, submission of patient-level outcome measures to an insurance system. Major barriers were lack of time, lack of outcome measures in local languages, inability to follow-up with patients and perceived inability of patients to understand outcome measures. Challenges that had not yet been identified in previous studies were inability to follow-up with patients and organisational culture (e.g., cultural hierarchy within an institution). The findings of our study provide an understanding of the contextual needs, and potential way forward for implementation of outcome measures in developing countries like Nepal. Future studies should focus on establishing consensus on which measures to use, the cross-cultural adaptation of these measures, and developing pathways for regulation. •Ours if one of the few studies from LMICs to assess the barriers and facilitators to outcome measure implementation.•Unique challenges reported were lack of patient follow-up and organisational culture.•Mandates from external bodies such as professional bodies, insurance companies, were deemed necessary.
ISSN:2468-7812
2468-7812
DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102859