The Therapeutic Efficacy of Freeze-Dried Human Amniotic Membrane Allograft Gel for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Phase-1 Clinical Trial

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are classified as hard-to-heal wounds, which occur in approximately 15% of diabetic patients. Several interventions have shown efficacy in reducing the risk of amputation among patients with DFU, including timely diagnosis and management of infection and ischemia, debride...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of lower extremity wounds 2023-10, p.15347346231204246-15347346231204246
Hauptverfasser: Rezaei-Nejad, Aida, Amirkhani, Mohammad-Amir, Ebrahimi, Alireza, Ghorani, Seyyed-Mojtaba, Alamoutifard, Emad, Nilforoushzadeh, Mohammad-Ali, Mollapour-Sisakht, Mahsa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are classified as hard-to-heal wounds, which occur in approximately 15% of diabetic patients. Several interventions have shown efficacy in reducing the risk of amputation among patients with DFU, including timely diagnosis and management of infection and ischemia, debridement of necrotic tissues, reducing mechanical pressure on ulcers, and patient education. One major challenge in the management of DFUs is optimizing wound care to improve healing outcomes. Recently, interdisciplinary approaches proposed a new generation of wound dressing which increased efficacy and significantly decreased the healing time. The current study assessed the healing characteristics of chronic DFUs treated with lyophilized amniotic membrane gel (LAMG) in combination with standard care, versus a placebo hydrogel with standard care. In total, 18 patients (8 male, 10 female) were randomly assigned to the control group, which received standard care and a gelatin scaffold (placebo), or the intervention group, which received standard care along with LAMG. We evaluated the reduction in wound size and assessed the patient's health-related quality of life over 9 weeks. In the LAMG group (n = 9) and the Placebo group (n = 9), the wounds were reduced in size by a mean of 73.4% ± 15.3% and 13.1% ± 10.1%, respectively ( P = .008). Patients treated with LAMG demonstrated significant improvements in the scores related to physical function, physical limitation, physical pain, general health, social function, emotional problems, and energy levels compared to the control group. The findings of this study indicate that using the LAMG with standard care significantly enhances wound healing.
ISSN:1534-7346
1552-6941
DOI:10.1177/15347346231204246