Long‐pulsed 1,064‐nm gallium arsenide laser surgical device treatment for improving symptoms of onychomycosis: a comparative analysis

BackgroundOnychomycosis is the most common infective nail disease, and treatment includes topical and systemic antifungal medications. Recently, laser therapy has emerged as a therapeutic option for patients who are unable to take oral antifungal agents. We investigated the effectiveness and safety...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of dermatology 2023-12, Vol.62 (12), p.1492-1498
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Sun Young, Shin, Sun Hye, Seok, Joon, Ko, Eun Jung, Yoo, Kwang Ho, Kim, Beom Joon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BackgroundOnychomycosis is the most common infective nail disease, and treatment includes topical and systemic antifungal medications. Recently, laser therapy has emerged as a therapeutic option for patients who are unable to take oral antifungal agents. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of a novel long‐pulsed 1,064‐nm gallium arsenide (GaAs) laser surgical device for onychomycosis.MethodsThis 24‐week single‐center, single‐blind, active‐controlled exploratory clinical study comparatively evaluated the long‐pulsed 1,064‐nm GaAs laser (Healer1064) with the short‐pulsed Nd:YAG laser surgical device in 20 participants randomly assigned to receive either test or control treatment at 4‐week intervals during the 12‐week treatment period. The rate of clinical improvement was evaluated by two independent dermatologist evaluators using the Onychomycosis Severity Index‐score (OSI‐score) and Turbidity Scale with standard photographs. Overall improvement and patient satisfaction were evaluated. Safety evaluation included pain intensity and adverse events.ResultsIn 44 (test: 25; control: 19) cases in 19 participants who completed treatment, the clinical improvement rate in the test and control groups was 52.00% (13/52 cases) and 44.44% (9/19 cases), respectively, with significantly lower pain scores in the test than the control group for every treatment visit (P 
ISSN:0011-9059
1365-4632
DOI:10.1111/ijd.16869