Hospital Testing of the Effectiveness of Co-Designed Educational Materials to Improve Patient and Visitor Knowledge and Confidence in Reporting Patient Deterioration
Co-designed educational materials could significantly improve the likelihood of patients and visitors (consumers) escalating care through hospital systems. The objective was to investigate patients’ and visitors’ knowledge and confidence in recognizing and reporting patient deterioration in hospital...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety 2024-02, Vol.50 (2), p.116-126 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Co-designed educational materials could significantly improve the likelihood of patients and visitors (consumers) escalating care through hospital systems. The objective was to investigate patients’ and visitors’ knowledge and confidence in recognizing and reporting patient deterioration in hospitals before and after exposure to educational materials.
A multimethod design involved a convenience sample of patients and visitors at a South Australian hospital. Knowledge and confidence of participants to report patient deterioration was assessed using a validated questionnaire. Baseline group was surveyed, and a second group was surveyed after exposure to a poster and on-hold message relating to consumer-initiated escalation-of-care. Nominal data were examined using chi-square analysis, and ordinal data using the Mann-Whitney U test. Open-ended questions were examined using thematic analysis.
A total of 407 participants completed the study, 203 undertook the baseline survey, and 204 the postintervention survey. Respondents exposed to the educational materials reported significantly higher recognition of responsibility to report concerns about patient deterioration compared to controls (86.3% vs. 73.1%; p = 0.007). Respondents exposed to the educational materials also had better ability to identify signs that a patient was becoming sicker compared to controls (77.5% vs. 71.3%, p = 0.012). Four overarching themes emerged from the questions: patient/visitor understanding of key messages, patient/visitor recognition of deterioration, patient/visitor response to deterioration and patient/visitor recommendations.
Following educational interventions, patients and visitors report improved awareness of their role in recognizing and responding to clinical deterioration. They advise additional active interventions and caution that the materials should accommodate language, cultural, and disability needs. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1553-7250 1938-131X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.09.001 |