Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein–Ligand Interactions by Considering Binding Affinity Information
Scoring functions for protein–ligand interactions play a critical role in structure-based drug design. Owing to the good balance between general applicability and computational efficiency, knowledge-based scoring functions have obtained significant advancements and achieved many successes. Neverthel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of physical chemistry. B 2023-10, Vol.127 (42), p.9021-9034 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9034 |
---|---|
container_issue | 42 |
container_start_page | 9021 |
container_title | The journal of physical chemistry. B |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Zhao, Xuejun Li, Hao Zhang, Keqiong Huang, Sheng-You |
description | Scoring functions for protein–ligand interactions play a critical role in structure-based drug design. Owing to the good balance between general applicability and computational efficiency, knowledge-based scoring functions have obtained significant advancements and achieved many successes. Nevertheless, knowledge-based scoring functions face a challenge in utilizing the experimental affinity data and thus may not perform well in binding affinity prediction. Addressing the challenge, we have proposed an improved version of the iterative knowledge-based scoring function ITScore by considering binding affinity information, which is referred to as ITScoreAff, based on a large training set of 6216 protein–ligand complexes with both structures and affinity data. ITScoreAff was extensively evaluated and compared with ITScore, 33 traditional, and 6 machine learning scoring functions in terms of docking power, ranking power, and screening power on the independent CASF-2016 benchmark. It was shown that ITScoreAff obtained an overall better performance than the other 40 scoring functions and gave an average success rate of 85.3% in docking power, a correlation coefficient of 0.723 in scoring power, and an average rank correlation coefficient of 0.668 in ranking power. In addition, ITScoreAff also achieved the overall best screening power when the top 10% of the ranked database were considered. These results demonstrated the robustness of ITScoreAff and its improvement over existing scoring functions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04421 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2876637893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2876637893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-b973dde6dd7376cd1ab8155270a7bb2cae89b145fd1099150d2b44fd0bc1335f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7l1m6cGoe81zWYrVYUFDXIc-SMk1qMlW78z_4D_0lZtpuXVzOhfudA_cAcInRCCOCb7iMo-VaihGVKM8JPgIDXBCUpamOD3uJUXkKzmJcIkQKUpcD8DXrdOCd_dDw0fnPVquFzm551Aq-SB-sW8DpxsnOegeND_A5-E5b9_v9M7cL7hScuT5gB0QotnCS1Cq9c95ap3odG2Od7bYJThkr3sPn4MTwNuqLgw7B2_TudfKQzZ_uZ5PxPOMU0y4TTUWV0qVSFa1KqTAXNS4KUiFeCUEk13UjcF4YhVHT4AIpIvLcKCQkprQwdAiu9rnr4N83OnZsZaPUbcud9pvISF2VJa3qhiYU7VEZfIxBG7YOdsXDlmHE-pJZKpn1JbNDyclyvbfsLn4TXPrlf_wPFTmDrA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2876637893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein–Ligand Interactions by Considering Binding Affinity Information</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Zhao, Xuejun ; Li, Hao ; Zhang, Keqiong ; Huang, Sheng-You</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xuejun ; Li, Hao ; Zhang, Keqiong ; Huang, Sheng-You</creatorcontrib><description>Scoring functions for protein–ligand interactions play a critical role in structure-based drug design. Owing to the good balance between general applicability and computational efficiency, knowledge-based scoring functions have obtained significant advancements and achieved many successes. Nevertheless, knowledge-based scoring functions face a challenge in utilizing the experimental affinity data and thus may not perform well in binding affinity prediction. Addressing the challenge, we have proposed an improved version of the iterative knowledge-based scoring function ITScore by considering binding affinity information, which is referred to as ITScoreAff, based on a large training set of 6216 protein–ligand complexes with both structures and affinity data. ITScoreAff was extensively evaluated and compared with ITScore, 33 traditional, and 6 machine learning scoring functions in terms of docking power, ranking power, and screening power on the independent CASF-2016 benchmark. It was shown that ITScoreAff obtained an overall better performance than the other 40 scoring functions and gave an average success rate of 85.3% in docking power, a correlation coefficient of 0.723 in scoring power, and an average rank correlation coefficient of 0.668 in ranking power. In addition, ITScoreAff also achieved the overall best screening power when the top 10% of the ranked database were considered. These results demonstrated the robustness of ITScoreAff and its improvement over existing scoring functions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-6106</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>B: Biophysical and Biochemical Systems and Processes</subject><ispartof>The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023-10, Vol.127 (42), p.9021-9034</ispartof><rights>2023 American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-b973dde6dd7376cd1ab8155270a7bb2cae89b145fd1099150d2b44fd0bc1335f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-b973dde6dd7376cd1ab8155270a7bb2cae89b145fd1099150d2b44fd0bc1335f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4209-4565</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04421$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04421$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xuejun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Keqiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Sheng-You</creatorcontrib><title>Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein–Ligand Interactions by Considering Binding Affinity Information</title><title>The journal of physical chemistry. B</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. B</addtitle><description>Scoring functions for protein–ligand interactions play a critical role in structure-based drug design. Owing to the good balance between general applicability and computational efficiency, knowledge-based scoring functions have obtained significant advancements and achieved many successes. Nevertheless, knowledge-based scoring functions face a challenge in utilizing the experimental affinity data and thus may not perform well in binding affinity prediction. Addressing the challenge, we have proposed an improved version of the iterative knowledge-based scoring function ITScore by considering binding affinity information, which is referred to as ITScoreAff, based on a large training set of 6216 protein–ligand complexes with both structures and affinity data. ITScoreAff was extensively evaluated and compared with ITScore, 33 traditional, and 6 machine learning scoring functions in terms of docking power, ranking power, and screening power on the independent CASF-2016 benchmark. It was shown that ITScoreAff obtained an overall better performance than the other 40 scoring functions and gave an average success rate of 85.3% in docking power, a correlation coefficient of 0.723 in scoring power, and an average rank correlation coefficient of 0.668 in ranking power. In addition, ITScoreAff also achieved the overall best screening power when the top 10% of the ranked database were considered. These results demonstrated the robustness of ITScoreAff and its improvement over existing scoring functions.</description><subject>B: Biophysical and Biochemical Systems and Processes</subject><issn>1520-6106</issn><issn>1520-5207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKt7l1m6cGoe81zWYrVYUFDXIc-SMk1qMlW78z_4D_0lZtpuXVzOhfudA_cAcInRCCOCb7iMo-VaihGVKM8JPgIDXBCUpamOD3uJUXkKzmJcIkQKUpcD8DXrdOCd_dDw0fnPVquFzm551Aq-SB-sW8DpxsnOegeND_A5-E5b9_v9M7cL7hScuT5gB0QotnCS1Cq9c95ap3odG2Od7bYJThkr3sPn4MTwNuqLgw7B2_TudfKQzZ_uZ5PxPOMU0y4TTUWV0qVSFa1KqTAXNS4KUiFeCUEk13UjcF4YhVHT4AIpIvLcKCQkprQwdAiu9rnr4N83OnZsZaPUbcud9pvISF2VJa3qhiYU7VEZfIxBG7YOdsXDlmHE-pJZKpn1JbNDyclyvbfsLn4TXPrlf_wPFTmDrA</recordid><startdate>20231026</startdate><enddate>20231026</enddate><creator>Zhao, Xuejun</creator><creator>Li, Hao</creator><creator>Zhang, Keqiong</creator><creator>Huang, Sheng-You</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4209-4565</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231026</creationdate><title>Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein–Ligand Interactions by Considering Binding Affinity Information</title><author>Zhao, Xuejun ; Li, Hao ; Zhang, Keqiong ; Huang, Sheng-You</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a313t-b973dde6dd7376cd1ab8155270a7bb2cae89b145fd1099150d2b44fd0bc1335f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>B: Biophysical and Biochemical Systems and Processes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xuejun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Keqiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Sheng-You</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of physical chemistry. B</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Xuejun</au><au>Li, Hao</au><au>Zhang, Keqiong</au><au>Huang, Sheng-You</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein–Ligand Interactions by Considering Binding Affinity Information</atitle><jtitle>The journal of physical chemistry. B</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. B</addtitle><date>2023-10-26</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>42</issue><spage>9021</spage><epage>9034</epage><pages>9021-9034</pages><issn>1520-6106</issn><eissn>1520-5207</eissn><abstract>Scoring functions for protein–ligand interactions play a critical role in structure-based drug design. Owing to the good balance between general applicability and computational efficiency, knowledge-based scoring functions have obtained significant advancements and achieved many successes. Nevertheless, knowledge-based scoring functions face a challenge in utilizing the experimental affinity data and thus may not perform well in binding affinity prediction. Addressing the challenge, we have proposed an improved version of the iterative knowledge-based scoring function ITScore by considering binding affinity information, which is referred to as ITScoreAff, based on a large training set of 6216 protein–ligand complexes with both structures and affinity data. ITScoreAff was extensively evaluated and compared with ITScore, 33 traditional, and 6 machine learning scoring functions in terms of docking power, ranking power, and screening power on the independent CASF-2016 benchmark. It was shown that ITScoreAff obtained an overall better performance than the other 40 scoring functions and gave an average success rate of 85.3% in docking power, a correlation coefficient of 0.723 in scoring power, and an average rank correlation coefficient of 0.668 in ranking power. In addition, ITScoreAff also achieved the overall best screening power when the top 10% of the ranked database were considered. These results demonstrated the robustness of ITScoreAff and its improvement over existing scoring functions.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04421</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4209-4565</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1520-6106 |
ispartof | The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023-10, Vol.127 (42), p.9021-9034 |
issn | 1520-6106 1520-5207 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2876637893 |
source | ACS Publications |
subjects | B: Biophysical and Biochemical Systems and Processes |
title | Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein–Ligand Interactions by Considering Binding Affinity Information |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A42%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Iterative%20Knowledge-Based%20Scoring%20Function%20for%20Protein%E2%80%93Ligand%20Interactions%20by%20Considering%20Binding%20Affinity%20Information&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20B&rft.au=Zhao,%20Xuejun&rft.date=2023-10-26&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=42&rft.spage=9021&rft.epage=9034&rft.pages=9021-9034&rft.issn=1520-6106&rft.eissn=1520-5207&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04421&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2876637893%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2876637893&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |