Iterative Knowledge-Based Scoring Function for Protein–Ligand Interactions by Considering Binding Affinity Information

Scoring functions for protein–ligand interactions play a critical role in structure-based drug design. Owing to the good balance between general applicability and computational efficiency, knowledge-based scoring functions have obtained significant advancements and achieved many successes. Neverthel...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of physical chemistry. B 2023-10, Vol.127 (42), p.9021-9034
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Xuejun, Li, Hao, Zhang, Keqiong, Huang, Sheng-You
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Scoring functions for protein–ligand interactions play a critical role in structure-based drug design. Owing to the good balance between general applicability and computational efficiency, knowledge-based scoring functions have obtained significant advancements and achieved many successes. Nevertheless, knowledge-based scoring functions face a challenge in utilizing the experimental affinity data and thus may not perform well in binding affinity prediction. Addressing the challenge, we have proposed an improved version of the iterative knowledge-based scoring function ITScore by considering binding affinity information, which is referred to as ITScoreAff, based on a large training set of 6216 protein–ligand complexes with both structures and affinity data. ITScoreAff was extensively evaluated and compared with ITScore, 33 traditional, and 6 machine learning scoring functions in terms of docking power, ranking power, and screening power on the independent CASF-2016 benchmark. It was shown that ITScoreAff obtained an overall better performance than the other 40 scoring functions and gave an average success rate of 85.3% in docking power, a correlation coefficient of 0.723 in scoring power, and an average rank correlation coefficient of 0.668 in ranking power. In addition, ITScoreAff also achieved the overall best screening power when the top 10% of the ranked database were considered. These results demonstrated the robustness of ITScoreAff and its improvement over existing scoring functions.
ISSN:1520-6106
1520-5207
DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c04421